In NASA's pre-launch briefing for Parker Solar Probe, the Weather Officer Kathy Rice discusses briefly the possibility of 'triggered lightning'. See around 40:55 in this video1.

She explains:

We can trigger a lightning strike with a launch and so it's not just the thunderstorm we're concerned about, we're also concerned about towering cumulus clouds... so there's also more than just the risk of natural lightning, there's also triggered lightning.

What is the triggered lightning mentioned?

Is it a strike on the vehicle itself or a strike on the ground caused by the launch?

Lightning has been known to strike vehicles during launch, and although I've never heard it called triggered lightning before, this could be what was mentioned. Electric discharges can also occur along engine plumes.

Is it one of these phenomena that is discussed in the briefing, or something else?

There are also lightning rockets which are used to intentionally trigger strikes, usually for research purposes.

As a reference, cumulus clouds can form with their bases as low as 360m, but I'm unsure of their typical altitudes over Cape Canaveral.

1At time of writing, I can't find an original video from NASA.


Rockets, especially big ones, create their own artificial, gaseous "wires".

Tall cumulus clouds reaching high enough that their upper parts are ice instead of water droplets generate powerful electric fields. The potential difference ("voltage") between the ground and the clouds can be huge, millions of volts. When the electric field strength, typically measured in volts per meter, reaches the breakdown voltage for air (something of a misnomer; it's actually the breakdown electric field strength), the air molecules ionize, its electrical resistance drops significantly, and a spark ensues. This breakdown voltage is a function of gas composition, temperature, pressure, and even the length of the conduction path! Long paths require lower electric field strengths to initiate a spark.

A cloud's high voltage is placed across the distance to the ground, so the average field strength is the voltage difference divided by the distance to the ground. If somewhere between the cloud and ground the local conditions reach breakdown, the voltage drop across that length of the path decreases significantly (see Ohm's Law). This means that the remaining voltage is applied across a shorter distance, so the field strength increases. Also, at the ends of the breakdown region, the temperature increases, reducing the breakdown field strength, so the breakdown region extends itself—very quickly! Eventually it reaches all the way from the cloud to the ground, sometimes with multiple local breakdowns that merge into one lightning stroke and "branches".

This is what a wire behind a rocket does. Along its length the voltage difference is essentially zero, so the voltage difference from the cloud now is applied to the shorter distance from the top of the wire to the cloud, increasing the electric field strength. This makes it more likely to initiate ("trigger") a local breakdown that cascades into a lightning stroke, connecting to the top of the wire. The YouTube video takes it from there, with exploding wire, etc.

The huge ion trail behind a big rocket acts like a wire. The mobility of the dissociated ions and electrons makes the electrical resistance of ionized gases, even partially ionized gases, far less than for un-ionized gases. The voltage drop across the length of the ion trail will thus decrease, concentrating the cloud-to-ground voltage across the shorter distance from the cloud to the rocket and increasing field strengths. This increases the probability of triggering a local breakdown and subsequent lightning stroke that travels through the rocket and its ion trail.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the very thorough answer! Do you know of any examples where this has happened during a launch (beyond the Apollo 12 incident discussed here) due to the exhaust plume rather than a trailing wire? $\endgroup$ – Jack Aug 11 '18 at 7:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Jack None come to mind. It might be that the Apollo 12 incident convinced people that it's not a good idea to launch when there are thunderstorms around but I'm not sure. That might be a good question to post. $\endgroup$ – Tom Spilker Aug 11 '18 at 22:15
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, I've asked a followup here $\endgroup$ – Jack Aug 12 '18 at 20:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.