This is not about about heat shields, materials, coolant, etc.

I am not quite not getting the science that explains the Heat Vs Temperature, which is how the Parker probe is going to survive the corona of Sun.


I can understand the oven vs boiling water comparison in the above link, but then does that mean there will not be any high temperature contact at all during the corona fly-through or those few high temperature particles will not damage the probe? Or even if it is very few particles that contact the probe, won't they still damage the probe because of the high temperature at 2 Million degrees?

So what it really means when we say the temperature of corona is at 2 million degrees Fahrenheit - say, if we place a thermometer in the corona (that can measure extreme levels), will that read 2 million degrees or 2,500 degrees?

Can someone help me understand in layman terms? or am I missing something very basic here?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You essentially have two very good questions here - what is the difference between heat and temperature? which would be better suited for Physics SE and what does it mean to measure the temperature of space? which may be better for Astronomy SE. Check to see if there isn't already an answer for you there! $\endgroup$ – Jack Aug 13 '18 at 10:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I won't VTC because someone may write a good answer in the context of Parker Solar Probe. While you wait, think about this: If I flick a drop of boiling 100°C water on you, it will sting a bit at worst. However, if you jump into a boiling bathtub at the same temperature... $\endgroup$ – Jack Aug 13 '18 at 10:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Jack Thanks, I just wasn't sure where this question should go and since I had this question based on the Parker Probe NASA article, posted it here. $\endgroup$ – SimpleMan Aug 14 '18 at 6:59

You are missing something basic here, which is that the Sun's corona is rather sparse. To take matters to an even greater extreme, consider the intergalactic medium. The temperature of the extremely sparse intergalactic medium can be in the hundreds of millions of kelvins. However, a macroscopic thermometer in this hot medium would not get anywhere close to those high temperatures. To the contrary, it would cool off, eventually reaching a temperature a tiny bit about 2.7 kelvin.

The temperature of a macroscopic object in space (e.g., a thermometer) has almost nothing to do with the temperature of the extremely thin medium that occupies that space. It instead depends on how much electromagnetic radiation the object is absorbing / emitting, and on thermal conduction amongst parts of the macroscopic object.

Consider the International Space Station. It orbits in a low density medium whose temperature can reach as high as three thousand kelvins. Those high temperatures are not a concern because of the low density. (The drag on the vehicle is a concern.) The Space Station's temperature instead represents a balance between the heat it gains in the form of sunlight versus the heat it loses in the form of thermal radiation into empty space. The heat transfer between the thermosphere and the ISS is numerical noise.

The Sun's corona at an altitude of six million kilometers above the photosphere is orders of magnitude less dense than is the thermosphere through which the ISS orbits. That the temperature of the Sun's atmosphere at that altitude is in the millions of degrees is as irrelevant to Parker Space Probe heating as is the temperature of the thermosphere with respect to ISS heating. What is relevant is that the Parker Space Probe will get much, much closer to the Sun than the roughly one astronomical unit distance between the ISS and the Sun.

The temperature of the Sun's corona has almost nothing to do with how hot the body of the Parker Space Probe will get. The body would cool to a bit above 2.7 kelvins if the probe's sunshield was perfect. It's not perfect; some heat transfer occurs between sunshield and the body of the probe via thermal conductivity. This heat transfer from the very hot sunshield to the probe's body is why the body's temperature will be around 300 kelvins rather than 2.7 kelvins.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the explanation. So, if I understand you correctly, you are saying that there is not enough matter to transfer a lot of heat from the Corona particles to the Parker probe through conduction or convection (modes of heat transfer), except a little through radiation. And, I believe the same goes with my thermometer thought, it would read only 2500 degrees. right? $\endgroup$ – SimpleMan Aug 14 '18 at 7:00

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.