Clicking through NASA.spinoff.gov I came to the page for spinnoff 2001 Glenn Research Center and found this:

Glenn Research Center's sapphire refractive secondary concentrator will be used with primary collector-concentrators to focus solar energy. The solar energy can be used in power conversion systems, thermal propulsion systems, and solar furnaces.

enter image description here

In Archive.org I found more images. Starting at this https://archive.org/details/GRC-C-2000-454 you can view many more at the bottom.

I then found these:

Near the bottom of page 3 of TM-2000-208401 in the section labeled Prototype Hardware Fabrication & Assembly, it says:

The secondary concentrator DTIRC has an 8.9 cm. inlet diameter, a 1.9 cm. exit diameter, and is 12 cm. long. The flux extractor is 15 cm. long and has 3 equilateral facets.

I think it means that the total length is 12 + 15 = 27cm.

I think the idea is that they are non-imaging and use what I have heard called non-Liouvillian optics; in other words they don't obey Liouville's Theorem and conserve phase space or étendue.

But I still don't understand what these are "for" or how much they actually concentrate.

Question: So I'd like to understand how the "Glenn Research Center's sapphire refractive secondary concentrator" works, and in what situation it is used with respect to the application (a solar rocket engine?), and with respect to the primary concentrator.

Here's the abstract for NASA TM-2000-208401:

A refractive secondary solar concentrator is a non-imaging optical device that accepts focused solar energy from a primary concentrator and redirects that light, by means of refraction and total internal reflection (TIR) into a cavity where the solar energy is used for power and/or propulsion applications. This concept offers a variety of advantages compared to typical reflective secondary concentrators (or the use of no secondary at all): higher optical efficiency, minimal secondary cooling requirements, a smaller cavity aperture, a reduction of outgassing from the cavity and flux tailoring of the solar energy within the heat receiver. During the past 2 years, NASA Lewis has been aggressively developing this concept in support of the NASA Marshall Shooting Star Flight Experiment. This paper provides a brief overview of the advantages and technical challenges associated with the development of a refractive secondary concentrator and the fabrication of a working unit in support of the flight demonstration program.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I wish they'd put something in the image for scale. Is the object shown 2 cm long, or 20 cm, or....? $\endgroup$ Aug 22, 2018 at 18:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Tom Spilker: They did put something in an image for scale, see page 6 figure 4 of this paper mentioned in the links of the question. $\endgroup$
    – Uwe
    Aug 22, 2018 at 22:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @TomSpilker I've added an additional block quote that suggests (to me at least) that the total length is about 27 cm. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Aug 23, 2018 at 1:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ah, the sun shines on the big end of the funnel! Too bad, I was visualizing a wall of jewel spikes pointing at the sun. $\endgroup$ Aug 23, 2018 at 13:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I wonder if these could be used in conjunction with smaller solar panels to increase output or at least decrease the amount of size required/allow for further effective range away from the Sun. $\endgroup$ Aug 23, 2018 at 19:30

1 Answer 1


After checking this reference (quoted in the question), here's my take on this device.

The general idea is to transfer concentrated solar energy from a primary concentrator, like a primary mirror, into a chamber (they call it a "cavity") for use in such applications as solar thermal power (electricity) production, solar thermal propulsion, or a solar furnace. These applications generally require that the chamber be at a higher pressure than the ambient environment, so the solar energy has to pass through some sort of transparent wall or window that allows maintaining the chamber pressure. Even if the chamber pressure is equal to ambient, an un-blocked opening in the chamber would let a lot of heat escape, both by radiation and by convection, so some kind of wall or window is needed.

The typical quasi-planar window suffers from significant reflective losses. The paper quotes as much as 50% of the incident light being reflected back out uselessly. The device shown cuts those reflective losses to nearly zero by using a material of high refractive index and a matched geometry that produces total internal reflections at all interfaces except those intended to transmit light directly into the chamber. The material's refractive index determines the angles of the facets and other surfaces.

The idea is to take energy concentrated to the maximum the primary concentrator can produce, limited by such things as the primary's focal length, the angular size of the sun from the device's location, etc., and concentrate it further to get higher temperatures. Higher temperatures are always a plus for such things as Carnot cycle devices.

It appears the secondary concentration ratio is essentially the ratio of the area of the input side of the cone to the area of the output side, if the transfer were lossless. Given the dimensions quoted in the reference above that ratio would be ~22:1. Were that output side just a flat surface at the small end of the conical section there would be a strong reflection there and energy would be lost. The purpose of the flux extractor is to avoid that flat surface at the end of the secondary concentrator (the conical section), transmitting the energy into the cavity through the high-angle-of-incidence facets, minimizing the net reflection coefficient.

Figure 2 of the reference shows how it is used in a solar thermal rocket engine. In that figure light enters from the left and is transmitted via the flux extractor into a cavity within a larger chamber. The cavity absorbs the light, converting it all to heat that conducts through the cavity walls. A working fluid (the propellant) flows to the right within the chamber, around the outside of the cavity, absorbs the heat from the cavity, and then is expelled through a standard de Laval nozzle. In the notional engine shown the concentrator is in a position normally occupied by the injector of a standard chemical rocket engine.

Given a set chamber temperature, propellants with lower average molecular (or atomic) masses yield higher specific impulse. Molecular hydrogen would be a good candidate for the propellant.

  • $\begingroup$ very nice! let me understand, the sum of the areas of the three facets is only 1/22 of the area of the circular entrance facet? It does not look like that. The areas look roughly equal. Can you show explicitly how you are getting 22:1? $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Aug 23, 2018 at 4:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm looking at the area of the large end of the conical section compared to the small end of the conical section, so I don't include any of the flux extractor. So the area of the "hole" in the cavity where the radiation enters is 1/22 of the area that would be needed without the secondary concentrator. The reference gave those diameters as 8.9 cm and 1.9 cm respectively, so that ratio squared is ~22. $\endgroup$ Aug 23, 2018 at 15:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.