2
$\begingroup$

Previously SpaceX Lunar mission date was 2022, but it is mentioned in the wiki that it is no earlier than 2023.

Why the date has been postponed?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Emphasis on the "no earlier than" $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble Sep 18 '18 at 12:13
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Putting my sarcastic hat on, futuristic SpaceX missions are almost always delayed. It's pretty much Standard Operating Procedure for SpaceX. While SpaceX has accomplished a lot (a whole lot), they also have a reputation for over-promising and under-delivering, particularly so with regard to schedule. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Sep 18 '18 at 22:21
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidHammen How long can it be reasonably expected to wait for the first flight of SpaceX's BFR? was closed as primarily opinion-based for the same reason. No sarcasm hat required! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Sep 19 '18 at 5:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ have any Musk targets not been postponed? $\endgroup$ – JCRM Sep 20 '18 at 15:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DavidHammen: Yeah. They deliver great things on a good schedule, but the things and schedule they promise are simply unrealistic. $\endgroup$ – SF. Sep 20 '18 at 15:06
4
$\begingroup$

The original lunar mission was proposed via Falcon Heavy and Dragon in 2018 and then delayed until it was cancelled. The Musk provided explanation is that the cost of man rating the Falcon 9 to NASA standards was worse than they expected, and for the number of Falcon Heavy flights, and the even smaller of likely manned flights, it was not worth the money. Especially since BFR was coming sooner rather than later, due to the long delays in Falcon Heavy.

Now that they have switched to using a BFR vehicle, they have to actually build, launch, and fully test it. This takes time. Per Elon Musk on the announcement of the first passenger, they had built the first barrel section (Need three or more for each of the BFR stages) so development is very early, and timeslines have stretched out.

This is rocket science.

A commentor noted that getting BFR man rated will be hard. Which of course it will, but notice the first manned customer who has paid a deposit is not NASA. Thus they really only need to satisfy the FAA about human safety, not NASA.

Rand Simberg has noted that it is possible that the NASA safety standards may not be as based on reality as they would like to portray, in fact he wrote an entire book on the topic of safety and the NASA approach.

Safe is not an Option Book

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'd guess one reason is that Musk found out just how hard is it to have a launch vehicle certified for human launch; got Falcon 9 certified for ISS deliveries, will get BFR certified for manned launches (which he needs for his Mars goal anyway), and completely dropped the ball on certifying Falcon Heavy. $\endgroup$ – SF. Sep 18 '18 at 12:03
  • $\begingroup$ Falcon Heavy will focus on revenues from everyone for heavy payloads for cheap prices. It'll probably be to fund spacex into BFR development and begin his plan for becoming Elon Marsk $\endgroup$ – Rajath Pai Sep 19 '18 at 1:53
  • $\begingroup$ One has to wonder if he will do the NASA certification for human flight for BFR. Hmmm... $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto Sep 19 '18 at 2:21
  • $\begingroup$ @PearsonArtPhoto: I'd be unsurprised if he got spaceflight certification without launch/reentry parts, and ferry passengers by Dragons. $\endgroup$ – SF. Sep 20 '18 at 12:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PearsonArtPhoto depending on how things play out, NASA certification may become increasingly irrelevant. $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble Sep 20 '18 at 16:25
3
$\begingroup$

The Previous SpaceX lunar mission was also planned with the same Japanese billionaire and on-board the falcon heavy and using the dragon capsule. However, SpaceXhas redirected the focus onto the new BFR project which seems to have finally fixed quite some design aspects aesthetically and are working on a 5 year time line to get it Human spaceflight ready. As the comments and the other answer points out. testing for human-centric spaceflight along with making test flights without humans can cost a lot of time and money. To ensure the safe return of the private individuals going up there without any technical staff maybe a challenge as well, so rigorous testing will be crucial and it will be a make/break point for the private space tourism industry that aims to offer tickets to space and make it as safe as possible. The 2023 already seems a highly optimistic target for the BFR.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I hadn't heard that "The previous SpaceX lunar mission was also planned with the same Japanese billionaire..." is there a link somewhere that can confirm that? Thanks! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Sep 19 '18 at 5:34
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Oh I watched the entire announcement. I was super excited. He mentions it at around 48th or 49 minute mark into the announcement. He's mentioned that it's the same person but with falcon heavy it would be crammed up and less people like 2 and Maezawa didn't wanna travel alone or with less people. So, he's funding the BFR and bought all the 100 seats on the first lunar flight. youtube.com/watch?v=ZyiIWcKM_Fk $\endgroup$ – Rajath Pai Sep 20 '18 at 0:26

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.