5
$\begingroup$

Most of the Voyagers' electronics are kept warm by electrical heaters powered by their RTG's, and presumably protected by some amount of insulation from the "cold of space" which means loss of heat via blackbody radiation. This is done because the carrier density in semiconductors (both intrinsic and those from dopants) is strongly temperature dependent.

See this answer to Would it be possible to build a probe that could operate at about 480 °C (900F degrees) without insulation? for a short discussion of semiconductor dopant engineering for extreme temperatures.

On the ground, to improve signal to noise (S/N) ratio for weak signals received from deep space, dishes like some of the larger ones of the Deep Space Network use cooled front-ends. For more on that, see the cool images (pun intended) and links in Why doesn't thermal radio emission from a DSN “hot dish” completely swamp the benefits of a cold LNA?.

Terrestrially located RF front-ends need heavy, bulky refrigerators for cryogenic front ends, but in space, thermal radiation can potentially provide a simple cooling mechanism which would have become fairly isotropic as the spacecraft moved away from the Sun. Most of Voyager is really, really cold now. See answers to How cold are the Voyagers now? Colder than LOX? Colder than SOX?

I'm wondering if the first active device, the receiver's first amplifier stage or front end is colder than the main electronics box by design, taking advantage of the free cooling available in the outer solar system where it's needed most.

Question: Did any of Voyagers' receivers' front ends take advantage of the "cold of space" to lower noise?

note: "any of" is there because in addition to various receivers used for comms from Earth, there are antennas for other reasons as well, including possibly plasma experiments or microwave radiometric measurements.

$\endgroup$
9
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Seems unlikely, the entire instrument box (which contains the receiver) is packed in MLI, temperature should be reasonably even within. $\endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    Oct 10, 2018 at 7:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Line item 10) in Table 5-2 of DESCANSO IV - Voyager Telecommunications gives an operating temperature average of 59K for the uplink receiver which is tantalizing. (Downlink receiver is 3K which is consistent with the cryogenic systems on the ground). There may be something here. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Oct 10, 2018 at 9:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Instead, I've just asked Why is the operating temperature for the Voyagers' receiver noise calculation about 1550K? $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Jan 5, 2019 at 7:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DialFrost the kind of receiver noise that the cold of space would lower is known as "thermal noise". It's the same noise that the front ends of receivers on Earth are cooled to reduce. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Sep 12, 2022 at 8:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DialFrost that's one kind; there's also (just for example) thermal noise radiated by other components of the receiver, cf Why doesn't thermal radio emission from a DSN "hot dish" completely swamp the benefits of a cold LNA? There is no need to overly specify the question by asking about only one source of thermal noise. I'll be happy to find out if "any of Voyagers' receivers' front ends take advantage of the 'cold of space' to lower (thermal) noise" no matter what its source. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Sep 12, 2022 at 8:13

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.