I can find no clear information regarding the use of the launch escape system in today's Soyoz MS-10 abort-to-ground. The failure seems to occur just as LES jettison is scheduled to take place.

The live webcast commentator is clearly describing the events as planned, not as they unfolded, so it is not clear how the Soyuz cleared the rocket without an LES.


1 Answer 1


Yes, the launch escape system was used, contrary to earlier reports based on assumptions and ignorance of Soyuz hardware.

However, it was not the tower that we are familiar with on Mercury and Apollo era manned rockets that was used.

The Russian launch escape system, SAS (Система Аварийного Спасения, or Sistema Avariynogo Spaseniya, meaning emergency rescue system), has two different motors, the solid escape motor tower (DU SAS), the type that fans of non-Shuttle NASA manned launches are familiar with, and 4 RDG (РДГ) boosters attached to the fairing. Some visualizations show the RDG boosters at the base of the fairing, while this diagram shows the boosters at the top just below the solid escape motor tower.

Soyuz Orbital and Descent modules inside of its fairing with the solid escape motor tower and RDG thrusters. Annotated in Russian.

Depending on when in the flight an abort is called, the SAS will behave differently. On the pad and up to the strap-on booster separation, the SAS will use the tower solid motor first, at 14 Gs of acceleration, then will switch to the RDG boosters for a few more seconds of thrust at around 7Gs. The high thrust of the solid escape motor tower is to counter any extra thrust that the strap on boosters may be providing, as well as to give enough height for the crew capsule's (Descent Module) parachutes to work when they're deployed.

After the first staging event, when the strap-on boosters are no longer firing, and until the fairing is separated when far enough out of the atmosphere, the RDG boosters would carry the crew away from the rest of the rocket.

For this specific flight:

At T+1min 54sec into flight, the solid escape motor tower (DU SAS) ejected from Soyuz MS-10

At T+1min 58sec, the first stage ended and second stage started, with the strap-on boosters being jettisoned. This is where there is evidence of an accident.

At T+2min 04sec, the core's engine shuts down, the Descent Module separated from the Service Module, and the RDG engines fired, pushing the fairing, Orbital Module, and Descent Module into its ballistic trajectory.

At T+2min 40sec, the Descent Module separated from the Orbital Module and left the fairing.

The announcer was basing their reporting based on canned telemetry, and did not realize what was going on until after the canned telemetry showed the second stage separation.

It is a tradition for Soyuz rockets to include a plush toy suspended above the crew on an elastic cord as a quick-and-dirty G-force indicator. About 2 minutes 40 seconds into the video that NASA released of the launch (link to YouTube), during first stage separation, we see an internal shot of the capsule where the toy is suspended to about 3 Gs, then instead of going to just 1.5 Gs as expected, it becomes weightless and the internal cameras glitch out, likely due to the directional antenna not being aligned properly any more.

Next we see the strap-on boosters flying away asymmetrically, instead of the usual Korolev Cross, we see 3 boosters tumble away, signs of heavy debris, and the exhaust from the core stage is very asymmetrical.

The video then goes on to show the canned telemetry, but we can hear the translator quietly in the background giving details about loss of thrust as they translate the crew's broadcasts.

Scott Manley produced two videos covering the early observations of the abort, and follows up with more information about the launch escape system used, where I get some additional information from.

  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Yeah, Scott Manley just posted an analysis. I'll be updating this with better information. Looks like one of the strap-on boosters likely collided with the core stage during separation. They did keep the LES tower on but did not use it... Will gather more details and better sources, then update the answer. $\endgroup$
    – Ghedipunk
    Commented Oct 11, 2018 at 18:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm getting yet more new information... Short synopsis as of now: there are two different Launch Escape Systems on this Soyuz... The tower and one built into the "shroud" (assuming the fairing). But as of now, this is based purely on various social media posts. They are consistent with each other, but nothing that can be cited on Wikipedia yet, despite Wikipedia's low standards. So after sleep and another round of research, I'll likely change this answer to Yes from No... but it wasn't the LES Tower, but a second LES that fired. $\endgroup$
    – Ghedipunk
    Commented Oct 12, 2018 at 7:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For another explanation of what happened, see planet4589.org/latest.html. According to that, the tower was jettisoned at T:154, and the problems didn't start until T+1:58. See also twitter.com/planet4589/status/1050472890410373123 for a discussion of the multiple pieces of the SAS (система аварийного спасения, sistema avariynovo spaseniya, System of Emergency Rescue) which is the Russian equivalent of the American LES. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 12, 2018 at 8:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For future visitors, the information in that "latest" link is likely to appear at planet4589.org/space/jsr/back/news.755.txt by mid-November. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 12, 2018 at 8:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There's a drawing here that shows the fairing-mounted solids, that might be a good addition to your very informative answer: forum.nasaspaceflight.com/… It also shows how the service module stays with the booster. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 12, 2018 at 19:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.