1
$\begingroup$

What things can be done mechanically to make the ISS more stable in a dormant state without a crew?
I have listed a couple of links that may work, but I am open for constructive criticism and new ideas.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The crew have nothing to do with keeping the ISS stable, it's all automatic. $\endgroup$
    – GdD
    Oct 23, 2018 at 8:16
  • $\begingroup$ @GdD space.com/… $\endgroup$
    – Muze
    Oct 23, 2018 at 17:34

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
3
$\begingroup$

Adding a long pole to the station (particularly with sufficient mass on the end) will increase the station's moment of inertia. This will reduce the effect that a perturbation will have on the station's attitude. However, it also makes it more difficult to correct an error in the attitude.

The reaction wheels that are already on the station are a better solution.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How does gravity gradient play into this? $\endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Oct 22, 2018 at 23:59
  • $\begingroup$ The pole itself would not have extra mass at the end. It would have solar vanes. $\endgroup$
    – Muze
    Oct 23, 2018 at 4:51
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Muze Which presumably have some mass. $\endgroup$
    – JMac
    Oct 23, 2018 at 11:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you want to comment on this in an informed way you should look up the subject. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity-gradient_stabilization Leaving this effect out makes your answer useless. $\endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Oct 24, 2018 at 16:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The ISS has Control Moment Gyroscopes, not reaction wheels. $\endgroup$
    – pericynthion
    Oct 27, 2018 at 17:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.