How much solid Carbon Dioxide can be collected in a container with the top of the container level with the ground during a Martian Winter? Side Question: What do you call a generator that runs on the seasons of the year?

At the end of the winter with the container ideally full and capped. During middle summer the container warms melting the solid carbon dioxide creating pressure.

How much pressure can be acquired this way in a year to turn a generator that runs an electrical arc or devise to crack carbon dioxide? The oxygen from cracked carbon dioxide would rise to the top of the container to be collected. Enough atmospheric pressure from the oxygen would keep the carbon dioxide as liquid separate from the Oxygen. Cracking carbon dioxide would create more heat and pressure inside the container to power the generator more.

Can enough ice collect at night to create a generator that runs one cycle per day instead of per year?

After the liquid carbon dioxide runs out how much oxygen would be left in the container?

Could the ice be mined to run this? Can a machine process and run on $CO_2$ and $H_2O$ for an $O_2$ by product?

I have combined the question with another question that was about to be marked as a duplicate for they were very similar. I apologize for the inconvenience if you have to add to your answer. Answers should still be valid.


  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If there are temperature and pressure conditions met for carbon dioxide to freeze out during martian winter, it will freeze everywhere on the ground, not only within the container. Ideally the height of ice deposit will be the same within and outside the container. $\endgroup$
    – Uwe
    Dec 15, 2018 at 21:01
  • $\begingroup$ Cracking carbon dioxide by electric energy is not that easy. If you manage to split some molecules in the electric arc they will recombine again just near the arc. Splitting carbon dioxide by electrolysis is difficult. $\endgroup$
    – Uwe
    Dec 15, 2018 at 21:30
  • $\begingroup$ @Uwe, NASA plans to do it with electrolysis and a catalyst. nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fs_moxie_150908.pdf Note that they aren't reducing it to solid carbon, but rather, to carbon monoxide, which would be vented to the atmosphere. $\endgroup$ Mar 11, 2019 at 1:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Muze, the heat engine that you describe basically is a very roundabout way of harvesting solar energy. Photovoltaic cells get the job done with no plumbing, and no moving parts. $\endgroup$ Mar 11, 2019 at 1:13
  • $\begingroup$ @SolomonSlow it is part of an engine that makes oxygen from the atmosphere. $\endgroup$
    – Muze
    Mar 11, 2019 at 2:21

1 Answer 1


Yes, in principle to both questions, why not? However we can calculate the maximum energy you could get from the generator. The vapour pressure of $CO_2$ at 0C is around 4MPa, so in a perfect world, you get a volume expansion of about $4 MPa/600Pa$ or 6400.

The formula for the work per mole done by isothermal expansion of a gas is


which here gives us roughly $8.6 kJ/mol$, much less than the roughly 1600 $kJ/mol$ needed to break both the carbon-oxygen bonds in $CO_2$.

So, assuming a perfectly efficient electrical generator and cracker (that produced no waste heat), you would have enough energy to crack roughly 0.5% ($8.6/1600$) of the $CO_2$ you trapped. That produces 32 g of oxygen and 12g of carbon from 44g of $CO_2$, using the power generated by about 10kg of $CO_2$ escaping through your turbine.

This article seems very relevant to the question of using electrical energy (whether from this type of turbine, or wind, solar or nuclear) to extract oxygen from $CO_2$. The work looks promising, but is currently at a very early stage, requiring expensive catalysts, a supply of water, very pure $CO_2$ etc. Efficiency is relatively good, but still not 100% and the products are $O_2$ and $CO$. This means that some oxygen is "wasted" as CO, but on the other hand much less energy is needed to do this conversion, so a larger fraction of the $CO_2$ can be cracked. Based on the same rough approximation as a above, 10kg of $CO_2$ trapped could create perhaps 160g of oxygen assuming perfect efficiency. Realistically, considerably less.

In practice, there are additional formidable challenges. A surface exposed to space in the Martian winter night will be cold enough for $CO_2$ to condense on it, but (a) you'd need to blow a lot of thin Martian air over the surface and (b) you'd need to remove and radiate away the latent heat released by the $CO_2$ as it solidifies. Otherwise you'd just get a very thin layer. Then you need to recover the energy efficiently from a flow of extremely low-density gas and find a very efficient chemical solution to "unburning" carbon. You'd also need to allow the liquid $CO_2$ to warm up as the evaporation into your generator cools it, which will limit the power you can extract.

Note: This replaces my previous answer which used the wrong formula for the energy released by the expanding gas, leading to a severely wrong final answer

  • $\begingroup$ ...and you're spending energy for storage of CO2 when it's most scarce, to recover it during the energy-abundant season. $\endgroup$
    – SF.
    Dec 15, 2018 at 15:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.