-5
$\begingroup$

If this is true then the problem of a reliable source of water on Mars, that is available the entire year, is solved.

enter image description here Crater on Mars filled with permanent ice. (Source: ESA, Mars Express)

The question is: How is it possible that none of the American satellites, one of them with a resolution at least 8 times better than Mars Express, have been able to discover this huge reservoir of water?

Update:

I have not found any NASA document that states the crater in the above image is filled with stable ice. I knew that the american probes discovered temporary carbonic and ordinary snow on the surface of Mars, but not permanent frozen water.

Old NASA pictures showing a crater filled with a white substance do not automatically imply the US space agency discovered permanent surface ice on Mars.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Just a note that that is not an actual photo. Per the image's source it "was generated using a digital terrain model and Mars Express [image] data". $\endgroup$ – Alex Hajnal Dec 21 '18 at 0:14
  • $\begingroup$ Your premise is wrong; the "it" in "How is it possible..." didn't happen/isn't true. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Dec 21 '18 at 0:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ -1 for the false premise forwarded in the question. It would be great to simply ask "is this really a first observation" (although there's nothing in your article that even suggests this is a discovery or a first). But by trying to push the view that there's a cover-up or conspiracy to hide or fake data, your question is no longer a genuine question, but instead an attempt to advance your own conspiracy theory. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Dec 21 '18 at 0:40
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ ...and this isn't the first or second time. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Dec 21 '18 at 0:53
  • $\begingroup$ You say that you find photographic evidence (bright white reflections in visible wavelengths) on its own is not sufficient to show the existence of water ice. What supporting evidence do you require to conclude that e.g. the white areas in the photos are water ice? $\endgroup$ – Alex Hajnal Dec 21 '18 at 19:23
9
$\begingroup$

The ice-filled Korolev crater appears in Viking imagery taken in the '70s. It took the arrival of suitable radars in orbit (like MARSIS on Mars Express and SHARAD on MRO, ca. 2005-6) to determine the ice's depth and structurea.

The question queries the veracity of the (unsourced) assertion that there is "[m]ore water in a crater on Mars1 than the quantity dumped by the river Nile into the Mediterranean sea in 45 years". We can easily check the validity of this claim. The paper in the latter link states that there is "a minimum ice volume of ~1400 km3 contained in Korolev" and a maximum (likely an overestimate) of 3,400 km3. The Nile river discharges at a rate of 2,830 m3/s which is 89.25 km3/year; over 45 years this comes out to 4,016.25 km3 which is way larger. A more accurate estimate would be over 16 years which, coincidentally, nicely matches the duration-to-date of the Mars Express mission.

As for the "photo"2 in the question, the article it was taken from3 appears to be partly based on an ESA press release entitled "Mars Express gets festive: A winter wonderland on Mars". The press release (and the image) are dated 2018-12-20, the same day the question was asked, and presumably was the source used by the linked article. In other words, this is not a new discovery but rather ESA having a bit of seasonal fun (and doing some good outreach/education in the process).

Regarding the update to the question, this paperb (based on Mars Odyssey data) indicates that the ice in Korolev crater is water ice and this papera (based on MRO data; same paper as linked earlier) concludes that the water ice there reaches a depth of ~1.8 km and has a volume of >~1,400 km3. The data used for the above papers comes from NASA probes (MO and MRO) and the authors are all from the US: 3 with US university affiliations4 and 2 from the USGS (the main US agency responsible for Martian mapping). In addition, there's this paperc based on MRO data and with a NASA employee as its primary author that states:

The North Polar Residual Cap (NPRC) is a surface water ice deposit that persists throughout the martian summer ... Multiple impact craters peripheral to the NPRC contain surface ice with similar appearance, albedo and spectra (Conway et al. 2012; Brown et al. 2008). Korolev crater contains the largest of these deposits and has thermal properties (Armstrong et al. 2005) and underlying layering (Brothers and Holt 2016[a]) that is similar to the NPRC.

(emphasis mine)

Generally though you'll find documents meeting your criteria (i.e. with analysis by an author directly employed by NASA) rather scarce since NASA is focused on data collection, not data analysis (which is more the domain of academia).

The overwhelming consensus, both NASA-affiliated and not, is that the northern ice sheet is currently permanent with some seasonal variation in size, distribution, and composition. There is an abundance of photographic, spectrographic, and radar data supporting this and no evidence showing that the region is seasonally ice-free. Two craters with permanent ice deposits (Korolev and Louth) lie in areas that, based solely on latitude, should only support perennial ice. At present, scientists are still weighing the evidence on the crater ice's age. Note that Brothers and Holta does not doubt that Korolev crater contains permanent ice rather it goes into the evidence supporting a young (<5Myo) versus old (>5Myo) age for the deposits. Said paper concludes that though the data is somewhat different than expected and is mixed it clearly supports a young age (possibly as little as 4Myo) for the crater ice. It goes on to suggest that despite a probable younger age for the crater ice, "martian polar climate (and paleoclimate) can best be deciphered through a unified study of Planum Boreum and circumpolar ice features."


1 Presumably Korolev since that's what's shown in the photo the questioner provided.

2 Actually CGI: "generated using a digital terrain model and Mars Express [image] data" (source)

3 Per the attribution given by the questioner.

4 Note that scientific instruments on NASA probes are typically run by university teams and not by NASA.


Cited papers

a Brothers, T. C., and J. W. Holt (2016), Three‐dimensional structure and origin of a 1.8 km thick ice dome within Korolev Crater, Mars, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 1443–1449, doi:10.1002/2015GL066440.
(download PDF)

b John C. Armstrong, Timothy N. Titus, Hugh H. Kieffer (2005), Evidence for subsurface water ice in Korolev crater, Mars, Icarus, Volume 174, Issue 2, 360-372, ISSN 0019-1035, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.10.032.
(no freely-available version)

c Adrian J. Brown, Jonathan Bapst, Shane Byrne (2017), Observations of a new stabilizing effect for polar water ice on Mars, arXiv:1711.06372v1 [astro-ph.EP]
(download PDF)


Korolev crater visible in a 1970s Viking image (near top, just right of center):

Viking image of Mars' north polar icecap

Source: USGS/NASA JPL

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The article you quoted ("Three‐dimensional structure and origin of a 1.8 km thick ice dome within Korolev Crater, Mars") says: "Perennial water ice is thought to be currently unstable there [in the Korolev crater]". ESA discovered the ice is permanent. $\endgroup$ – Robert Werner Dec 21 '18 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertWerner Which paper (not press release, etc.) based on ESA data/analysis concludes/states that the water ice in Korolev is permanent and further states/shows that it was previously believed to be entirely perennial? Also, I got the impression that you don't trust ESA data/analysis and only trust NASA data/analysis, is this correct? $\endgroup$ – Alex Hajnal Dec 21 '18 at 20:12
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertWerner The quote you cite is taken in isolation and out of context. I addressed it and the full paper's conclusions in my answer. $\endgroup$ – Alex Hajnal Dec 21 '18 at 20:18
4
$\begingroup$

Korolev crater has been sitting there in plain sight for quite a while already. There is no sudden "discovery", just the ESA press office doing it's job.

The image itself is a composite of pictures of the crater taken by the Mars Express High Resolution Stereo Camera. The European Space Agency's Mars Express mission is celebrating 15 years after it launched in June 2003 and entered Martian orbit on December 25, 2003.

I think the only news here is that this is Mars Express' fifteen year anniversary. Release of this composite image to news organizations is just meant to celebrate that fact. I don't believe there is any scientific news here.

Here's a screen shot from https://www.google.com/mars/ which uses NASA data, not ESA. The image credit at the bottom reads:

Copyright NASA / JPL / MSSS / Arizona State University

Korolev crater google mars


Here is Korolev Crater: Mars Global Surveyor Mars Orbiter Camera Wave Clouds off Korolev MGS MOC Release No. MOC2-865, 30 September 2004

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that 1999 is the year the image was added to the online archive. The actual data was acquired in the '70s. $\endgroup$ – Alex Hajnal Dec 21 '18 at 0:43
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexHajnal thanks and good job for tracking down the information! I've removed it and added something else instead so that our answers are complementary. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Dec 21 '18 at 0:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The image that the OP used appears to be from an ESA press release entitled "Mars Express gets festive: A winter wonderland on Mars". Not a new discovery but rather ESA having a bit of seasonal fun (and doing some good outreach/education in the process). $\endgroup$ – Alex Hajnal Dec 21 '18 at 1:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why not; I'll add it when I'm in front of a real keyboard. $\endgroup$ – Alex Hajnal Dec 21 '18 at 1:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RobertWerner Though it focuses on the more-extreme Louth crater, Brown, Bapst, and Byrne (as quoted in my answer) does clearly state that the Korolev ice is permanent. Brown (the paper's PI) is a NASA employee and the paper is based on MRO (i.e. NASA) data. The existence of currently permanent water ice in the northern polar region of Mars (including Korolev crater) is not in doubt both within and without NASA. $\endgroup$ – Alex Hajnal Dec 21 '18 at 19:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.