1
$\begingroup$

Tensors make me tense.

Imagine a long thin rod in a circular orbit. The gravity gradient will produce a net torque on the rod whenever it is not oriented parallel, or perpendicular to the radius vector (pointing up/down or pointing forward/backward). Let's keep the problem 2D and ignore out-of-plane orientations.

The Coursera video 1: Gravity Gradient Torque Development from the course by University of Colorado Boulder Kinetics: Studying Spacecraft Motion taught by Hanspeter Schaub includes the following:

$$ L_G = \frac{3 GM_E}{R_C^5} \mathbf{R_C} \times [I] \mathbf{R_C},$$

which comes from a first order expansion of the local gravity gradient.

He explains that at this point (about 16:30) that you need to stop and think about coordinate systems and frames, and that's when I start feeling like this guy lower your volume first!

For an infinitely thin rod in 2D, I am guessing that the moment of inertia tensor is just

$$ I = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{12}ml^2 & 0\\ 0 & 0\\ \end{bmatrix}. $$

Now what? I need to get a $\sin(2\theta)$ somehow so that the torque will be zero at both 0 and 90 degrees. What sort of tensor magic multiplication can get me there?

SMAD first edition gives:

$$\frac{3 \mu}{R_0^3} \mathbf{u_e} \times (\mathbf{I} \cdot \mathbf{u_e})$$

where $\mathbf{u_e}$ is the unit vector towards the nadir. It seems to be essentially the same, but with the magical tension-inducing tensor math written slightly differently. Dot product between two vectors gives a scalar, but here I don't know what to do.

In each case $\mathbf{R_C}$ or $\mathbf{R_0}$ are from the center of the Earth to the rod's center of mass.

Question: How would I derive that expression for torque in terms of an angle $\theta$ that the rod makes with respect to the nadir, such that the torque has a $\sin(2\theta)$ term, using my simple 2D moment of inertia?

Please, no small angle approximations!


U. Colorado Boulder Kinetics: Studying Spacecraft Motion Coursera

Screen Shot

SMAD

SMAD first edition

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ possibly helpful? I see a $\sin(2\theta)$ in Eq. A.16 here but I've run out of steam... $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 22 at 2:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Paul It is from intuition. I know it's got to be there from symmetry. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 22 at 3:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hint: recall that $sin(2\theta)=2sin(\theta)cos(\theta)$. Everything else should be straight forward from that linked appendix. $\endgroup$ – Paul Jan 22 at 3:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Multiplying a rank 2 tensor to a vector is no different from multiplying a matrix to a vector. The trigonometric terms come from the euler rotations in the formula for the torque. Remember: attitude is everything! $\endgroup$ – Paul Jan 22 at 3:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let us continue this discussion in chat. $\endgroup$ – Paul Jan 22 at 3:50
1
$\begingroup$

Let $\theta$ be the angle between the direction of the rod and the direction toward the Earth, measured counter-clockwise. Then in the system of coordinates you used to write $I$ as $$\begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{12}ml^2 & 0\\ 0 & 0\\ \end{bmatrix}, $$ $\mathbf{R_C}$ has the form $$ \left(\begin{array}{c} R_C\cos\theta \\ R_C\sin\theta\end{array}\right). $$ Then $I\mathbf{R_C}$ is obtained by matrix multiplication: $$ I\mathbf{R_C} = \left(\begin{array}{c} \frac{1}{12}ml^2R_C\cos\theta \\ 0\end{array}\right), $$ and the cross product is $$ \mathbf{R_C}\times I\mathbf{R_C} = - R_C\sin\theta\cdot \frac{1}{12}ml^2R_C\cos\theta = -\frac{1}{24}ml^2R_C^2\sin 2\theta. $$ (Strictly speaking, the cross product is a three-dimensional vector, but if we restrict ourselves to a plane, then this vector is always perpendicular to this plane, so we can view it as a scalar.)

And the final result is $$ L_G = -\frac{GM_Eml^2}{8R_C^3}\sin 2\theta. $$

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's excellent! I probably shot myself in the foot by trying to force a 3D problem into 2D, rather than just leave some zeros. Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 22 at 9:20
  • $\begingroup$ Can it really be true that the instantaneous angular acceleration for the thin rod is independent of length (to first order), and just $\ddot{\theta} = \dot{\omega} = -(3GM_E/2R_C^3)\sin(2\theta)$? That maxes out at about 0.4 degrees/minute^2 at 45 degrees; that's pretty cool! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 22 at 9:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh You're welcome. And yes, your formula looks correct. $\endgroup$ – Litho Jan 22 at 10:10
  • $\begingroup$ sweet! I've used it here now. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 22 at 10:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.