According to this answer and this question the Voyagers will run out of power to "operate a single instrument" in 2025 for Voyager 2 and a little longer for Voyager 1. It is purported to be the end of mission.

But there is scientific data available even from a weak carrier, or from a 40 bit/sec transmission of internal engineering data, even if there are no scientific instruments running.

The Doppler shift provides a continued measure of velocity, and that can potentially provide some information about gravitational potential in the interstellar region. There could even be surprises if a body with some mass passed by and perturbed one of their trajectories slightly.

The frequency, amplitude, and phase of the are also affected by plasma, so if something happened unexpectedly there could be a change. If the spacecraft were bumped by something, the pointing would be altered and this would show up in the strength of the received signal.

So please, no arguments that there is no science to be had once the science packages are turned off!

Suppose there was funding and support to keep listening to the Voyagers as long as they could continue to transmit anything at all, and instructions were sent to configure them in such a way as to allow them to transmit some minimal signal for as absolutely long as possible.

What specifically would be the last straw for the Voyagers that would shut them down or silence them?

Would there be a low-power fault interrupt, or would something burn out, or would the computer's electronics get too cold to operate, or would the radio electronics get too cold to operate, or maybe something else?

Per this answer and references therein, there is plenty of room in the link budget to receive signals from them for a long time to come, much longer than they are likely to last in terms of electrical power.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I’ve been looking for information on whether they have a backup plan for pointing once the craft reaches the “thrusters out of fuel” state, but haven’t found anything. If there isn’t one, I suspect that’ll be the first condition to silence a Voyager, at least as far as Earth is concerned. $\endgroup$ May 8, 2019 at 4:56
  • $\begingroup$ An interesting question, I wonder if there's an answer. $\endgroup$
    – GdD
    May 8, 2019 at 9:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There's a related question for Electronics.SE: what happens to a TWT amplifier when its input power level drops below nominal. I've no idea if the output would drop linearly, or if it'd fall off a cliff. $\endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    May 8, 2019 at 10:19

2 Answers 2


In this scenario, the last straw would be the hydrazine freezing which leads to loss of the thrusters. After a while, the loss of attitude control means Earth drifts out of view of the HGA.

The impression I get from reading a lot about Voyager's systems in the last few days is that quite a large part of Voyager's power budget seems to be going towards heating at the moment (270 W available, transmitter requires 70 W, instruments aren't using 200 W so a lot must be used to keep the spacecraft near room temperature). The DTR on Voyager 2 is kept powered up just for its internal heaters, for instance.

Switch off those heaters, and the internal temperature will start dropping, and eventually the hydrazine will freeze.


We could not know for sure. There may be a failure of the transmitter, of the computer or of the attitude control. Or a malfunction caused by decreasing temperature when heaters must be switched off. The RTGs worked so long without problems, but there is a small probability for a total failure of the RTGs. But only if there is no failure we may see the effects of a gradual loss of power.

If there is a sudden final loss of signal, we could not know what happened and what was the reason.

Measuring the Doppler shift requires a very precise and stable transmitter frequency, but will the master clock circuit still work when temperature and operating voltage are dropping below specification?

  • $\begingroup$ To "What data should be transmitted..." as I took some time to explain in the question, there is and has always has been science in the nature of the received signal itself. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    May 8, 2019 at 23:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.