11
$\begingroup$

Would a complete Apollo-Saturn stack (like e.g. AS-506) be human-rated according to the latest human-rating process (NPR 8705.2C) of NASA?

If not, what are the biggest show-stoppers?

This question was prompted by an answer by geoffc to Why are the very reliable rockets Atlas V and Ariane V not rated for human flight?, especially the following part:

Thing is, Soyuz does not meet it, yet has flown how many hundreds of manned flights (And 1700 total flights for the booster). [...] The Shuttle would not meet the standards either. Not sure about Apollo/Saturn V (and NASA would probably very much like people NOT to ask that question, I suspect.)

|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is a great question, but I'm not entirely sure we can get a definitive answer unless someone from NASA who is directly responsible for launch vehicle safety certification and is also an expert in the Saturn V answers. $\endgroup$ – Michael Stachowsky May 24 at 15:15
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MichaelStachowsky I tried to keep this question narrow enough for stack by only requiring falsification. Its enough to identify one item of the specification that the Saturn V fails. I am aware that the other case is too broad, that is why I started this meta discussion before asking the question. $\endgroup$ – Polygnome May 24 at 15:59
  • $\begingroup$ The electronics and computers of the Apollo-Saturn stack could not be build and programmed in the same way as decades ago. So all that would require a new man rating anyway. $\endgroup$ – Uwe May 24 at 16:00
  • $\begingroup$ @Uwe I am not asking about rebuilding one now and certifying it (thats impossible anyway for so many reasons). I am talking about applying the current specification to an old rocket (with the old, existing computer). $\endgroup$ – Polygnome May 25 at 7:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.