3
$\begingroup$

Are there any atheist or agnostic American astronauts, past or present?

If no was this policy? (If no how did that happen and is there a policy going forward?)

Yes these are three questions but they so intertwined I opted to not make them three different questions.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I looked for the information but couldn’t find wether Jean Loup Chrétien was atheist or not. Would’ve been funny given his last name literally means Christian. $\endgroup$
    – Antzi
    Jun 29 '19 at 14:28
  • $\begingroup$ I hope there are, because a) atheists constitute a large fraction of the American population and b) atheists are by and large rational people with strong values who happen to reject religion because they find no factual basis to support its entertaining but outlandish claims. Not trying to stoke a fire. Just saying atheists exist, they have values, are good people, and they like cats and equal representation---just like religious people. $\endgroup$
    – user39728
    May 5 at 21:42
14
$\begingroup$

Are there any atheist or agnostic American astronauts, past or present?

With the hundreds of astronauts who have been through the American space program, I am sure there are more than a few atheists and agnostics, but they're likely quiet about it. The only publicly self-identified atheist astronaut I know of is not American, ESA's Christer Fuglesang.

If no was this policy? (If no how did that happen and is there a policy going forward?)

If there was a policy against atheist astronauts it would be rapidly and loudly challenged. The US constitution states "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust", and that clause has been interpreted fairly broadly by the courts. Organized atheist groups would be constantly protesting NASA if there was even a hint of a policy against hiring atheists as astronauts.

The early astronauts were pretty open about their religion, and at that time, being a church-going Christian of some denomination was a big part of the image that NASA was trying to cultivate for those astronauts -- while I'm sure there was no formal policy saying the astronauts selected for the Mercury program had to be Christian, open atheists simply wouldn't have been selected at that time. On the flip side, it's impossible to know how many of these churchgoing nominal Christians actually were believers. It was very common in the 20th century US for atheists or agnostics to attend church to fit in with their communities.

Some of the Apollo astronauts seem to have had their religious beliefs strengthened by their experience, while others did not.

Apollo 15's James Irwin was a lapsed Christian but became a devout born-again Christian after his flight.

A16's Charlie Duke also became born-again in 1978 but it's not clear from his WP article what his religious practice was during Apollo.

Duke's A16 crewmate John Young was unmoved:

Interviewer: Did you discover God up there?

Young: No. I don’t think so.

Interviewer: No sense of awe? Wonder?

Young: No.

Interviewer: Why not?

Young: Because I think that the way things are in space are the way they are and I think that’s a good thing. I think that if people have to go into space to discover God, they have some other kind of problem.

This sounds like Young was an agnostic, but it's not necessarily conclusive.

A14's Ed Mitchell held unconventional spiritual beliefs.

In the shuttle and post-shuttle era, there was a significant shift in astronaut demographics: scientists and engineers constituted significant portions of the astronaut corps, which was previously dominated by military officers with test pilot training. Of the 12 Apollo moon walkers, for example, only one, A17 LMP Harrison Schmitt, was a scientist; on the later shuttle missions it was common for 3-5 members of a 7-person crew to be engineers or scientists. Atheists and agnostics make up a larger proportion of the scientific community than the military, so one would expect more of them in the 21st century astronaut corps.

Over the last several decades, a couple of things happened: astronauts became less celebrated, and American attitudes toward organized religion shifted. Since the public doesn't see as much of an astronaut's private life as they did in the 1960s, it's easier for an astronaut to keep their beliefs -- religious or not -- private. Fewer Americans are involved in organized religion today, and to avoid conflicts, many Americans avoid raising the topic of religion, especially in the workplace, and doubly so in government workplaces.

$\endgroup$
9
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Another pressure to depict early astronauts as church-going Christians was to portray them as the opposite to Soviet cosmonauts. The space race was happening and many Americans felt that their religiousness made them superior to "God-fearing communists". $\endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    Jun 29 '19 at 6:09
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ That would be "Godless communists"... $\endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    Jun 29 '19 at 6:31
  • $\begingroup$ Have any atheists been to the moon? And as you say NASA had been cultivating the 'doing god's work' policy. Did that shift occur with the liberalization of the late 60's? As for Article VI, is it true it applies only to elected or oath-taking positions? $\endgroup$ Jun 29 '19 at 10:12
  • $\begingroup$ The WP article on the "no religious test" clause indicates that applies to any federal government position, not just elected or sworn positions, but I'm not an expert on the judicial history there. I'll incorporate some info I found about the religious beliefs of some of the Apollo astronauts. $\endgroup$ Jun 29 '19 at 17:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure Young's statement is atheist, I'd say it suggested the opposite, however it might have been a carefully crafted response to have that effect. $\endgroup$
    – user20636
    Jun 29 '19 at 17:55
3
$\begingroup$

William Anders who flew on Apollo 8 started to question his Catholic beliefs on his flight. He became an atheist.

The Seattle Times' December 24, 2018 piece With a view from beyond the moon, an astronaut talks religion, politics and possibilities alludes to this:

Ironically, Anders’ six days in space forever altered his own view of his place in the universe. Raised a Catholic, Anders says he held generally to a traditional Christian viewpoint of the Earth being created by a God who fashioned Earthlings in his own image.

The view from space changed everything.

Earth, seen from the moon, Anders explains, looks to be about the size of your fist at arm’s length. Two lunar distances away, it’s half that size; at eight, it’s one-eighth of that. And so on. Even at 100 lunar distances, still far short of Mars or any other planet, Earth is rendered as a dust speck — beyond insignificant against the vast scale of the universe.

It is one thing to imagine this. It’s another to get far enough into space to feel it.

“When I looked back and saw that tiny Earth, it snapped my world view,” Anders says. “Here we are, on kind of a physically inconsequential planet, going around a not particularly significant star, going around a galaxy of billions of stars that’s not a particularly significant galaxy — in a universe where there’s billions and billions of galaxies.”

“Are we really that special? I don’t think so.”

$\endgroup$
4
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ This answer would be improved by citing a source. $\endgroup$ May 5 at 19:57
  • $\begingroup$ To my best knowledge, practically no Catholic would have any problem with the space exploration, and they do not consider it contradicting with the Bible in any sense. Some neo-protestant branches of the Christianity does, but they are a minority even in the USA. Flat Earth theory and similars do not root in religions, they root in the low quality of the elementary education in the USA. $\endgroup$
    – peterh
    May 6 at 10:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The Catholic church not only "has no problem" with space exploration, it actively supports it! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_Observatory $\endgroup$ May 6 at 15:59
  • $\begingroup$ I've added a block quote from your source here. That was probably meant to be a comment and should be incorporated into this answer rather than a separate answer. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    May 7 at 7:53
1
$\begingroup$

I have only casually spoken with a few (maybe six) former astronauts while I was visiting the Kennedy Space Center at Cape Canaveral. From my conversations with those former travelers into space, with me inquiring about any self proclaimed atheists of those who have been in space, the former astronauts say that they are knowledgeable of none.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I edited your question and removed your personal narrative. Stack Exchange answers need to be based on facts. Occasionally information which can't be verified can be added to a question that contains verifiable information as well. Can you add anything to this that can be independently verified? Thanks! and Welcome to Space! $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Oct 26 '19 at 9:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh Whose question. $\endgroup$ Oct 26 '19 at 12:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I can not remember a single sentence in the Bible saying that God would be some super-developed material thing in the sky/space. It is a possible interpretation for people not knowing science. Btw, the science-related content of the Bible is practically zero. The little about stars/sky/space are about how do the ancient people perceived the reality, while it does not say anything about the reality itself, and it is never in the focal point of the context. $\endgroup$
    – peterh
    May 6 at 11:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.