Per Wikipedia's Spektr-RG; Mission profile and orbit:

Mission profile and orbit

The spacecraft will enter an orbit around the Sun, at the L2 Lagrangian point, about 1.5 million kilometers away from Earth, with the Earth shading it from sunlight. That operation will take three months, during which the payload will be checked out and calibrated. The next four years will be spent performing eight all-sky surveys. The three years after that are scheduled for observations of selected galaxy clusters and other objects of interest.

Gunter's Space Page for Spektr-RG (SXG) says instead that it will be in a halo orbit around SE-L2:

...SXG will be in a halo orbit around the Lagrange point L-2.

Space.com's says:

Spektr-RG will next navigate to a stable orbit in space called a Lagrange point (specifically, L2), where the gravitational forces of two large objects — in this case, the sun and the Earth — balance each other out. This location will allow Spektr-RG to perform its observations while using a minimal amount of fuel.

[...]The observatory includes two X-ray mirror telescopes, called ART-XC and eROSITA. ART-XC (a Russian payload) will examine the higher energies of X-rays, up to 30 keV, while eROSITA (Extended Roentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array) is optimized for an energy range of 0.5 to 10 keV.


  1. Why put X-ray telescope Spektr-RG all the way out at Sun-Earth L2? JWST is far from Earth to remain thermally stable by avoiding radiant heat from Earth (and several other reasons) but I don't think the whole Spektr-RG telescope needs to be cryogenic.
  2. Will it be in a halo or Lissajous orbit around L2 (like most spacecraft at L1 or L2) or will it actually be at L2 proper "with the Earth shading it from sunlight."?

enter image description here Spektr-RG, Lavochkin Source

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe interesting reading: arxiv.org/abs/1209.3114 ; chapter 3 will list the (planed) orbital parameters of the halo around L2 $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 15, 2019 at 13:59
  • $\begingroup$ imprs-astro.mpg.de/sites/default/files/… has in 3.4 a nice "Comparison of the Low Earth Orbit with the Orbit around L2" $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 15, 2019 at 14:16
  • $\begingroup$ @samcarter I think the first two paragraphs of Section 3 in the first link contain at least two reasons that could be the basis of a good answer, and yes the end of section 3.4 confirms this. I'd say write it up, it's a good answer! $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Jul 15, 2019 at 14:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ok, I'll write something up $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 15, 2019 at 14:45

1 Answer 1


eRosita is on its way to an elliptical orbit around L2 (with L2 in the centre of the ellipse).

enter image description here

(image source: https://www.slideshare.net/esaops/wilms, p. 19)

According to Merloni et al. (2012, https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3114), the semi-major axis is planed with about 1,000,000 km and the orbital period should be about 6 months.

Taking a look into the eventful history of the project which now became eRosita, it is interesting to see that a very different orbit was first planned. The history of eRosita goes back to ABRIXAS, an X-ray satellite which was launched but could never be put into operation due to technical problems. To replace this satellite, plans for the ROSITA telescope evolved. This telescope was planned to be mounted to the ISS and use a very similar design as ABRIXAS, but closer investigation relieved that the location would not be suitable for the telescope. Not giving up on the idea, the next design study was DUO, a cooperation with NASA, which was basically the ROSITA telescope mounted onto a LEO satellite, but this remained in the design phase. Finally an extended version of these ROSITA plans (eRosita) was realised together with Roskosmos. At first this was also planned to have a LEO, but in 2008 this was changed into a L2 orbit for "due to space flight related reasons"

Advantages of the new orbit:

  • possibility for continuous observing time without occultations by the Earth
  • stable thermal conditions
  • no downtimes due to crossing of the South Atlantic Anomaly

Disadvantage of the new orbit:

  • higher expected background radiation
  • need for radiation resist electronic due to orbit outside of the Van Allen belts

(the above paragraph is summarised from https://www.imprs-astro.mpg.de/sites/default/files/Muehlegger_Martin_2010.pdf, see the linked pdf for more details)

Peter Predehl, the scientific Director of eRosita named the following main reasons for the L2 orbit in an interview:

There are three main reasons for this:

  • At a location around the Libration point 2, which is about 1.5 million km from Earth, our planet is not in the way.
  • There is also a constant temperature out there because the instruments are not exposed to the constant change of day and night.
  • Thirdly, the location allows a permanent observation of the sky.

(quote from https://www.mpg.de/13559826/the-telescope-offers-enormous-potential)

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh Thanks for your comments! I expanded my answer a bit. I can make it a community wiki answer in case you would like to add something. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 15, 2019 at 16:03
  • $\begingroup$ It's great when someone takes the time to dig-in and write an authoritative, thorough, and well-sourced answer! $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Jul 31, 2019 at 4:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh Thanks for offering the bounty! Quick status update: eRosita is now more than 1 Mio km away from Earth and is outgasing to avoid contamination of the detectors when they will be cooled down $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 31, 2019 at 9:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.