3
$\begingroup$

The Gizmodo article NASA fights to keep the Voyager probes running after four decades says:

As another example of the probes' need to adapt to circumstances to keep going, Voyager 2 has fired up its correction maneuver thrusters on July 8th, 30 years after it was last fired. Its attitude control thrusters are old and haven't been working as well, requiring the probe to fire an increasing number of pulses to make sure its antenna keeps pointed at our planet. Now, the spacecraft has switched thrusters like the Voyager 1 did in 2018, and will be using them to correct its orientation.

Question: What does it mean when the Voyagers "switch thrusters"? What exactly was switched from/to, and how was the switch implemented?

Possibly helpful:

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Voyager 2 included 16 hydrazine thrusters, three-axis stabilization, gyroscopes and celestial referencing instruments (Sun sensor/Canopus Star Tracker) to maintain pointing of the high-gain antenna toward Earth. Collectively these instruments are part of the Attitude and Articulation Control Subsystem (AACS) along with redundant units of most instruments and ***8 backup thrusters***. - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_2 $\endgroup$ – Magic Octopus Urn Jul 15 at 13:17
  • $\begingroup$ Backup thrusters? $\endgroup$ – Magic Octopus Urn Jul 15 at 13:17
  • $\begingroup$ Does space.stackexchange.com/questions/23895/… not answer your question? " the others in two redundant six-thruster branches, to stabilize the spacecraft on its three axes. Only one branch of attitude control thrusters is needed at any time." $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Jul 15 at 13:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Hobbes No I don't think so. While some of the information that can answer my current question might be present in answers to that question (which is why I've linked to it in my question above) right now I don't see a clear unambiguous answer to "Question: What does it mean when the Voyagers 'switch thrusters'? What exactly was switched from/to, and how was the switch implemented?" $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jul 15 at 13:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The answer turns out to be more complex (and more interesting) than I thought initially. $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Jul 16 at 12:23
6
$\begingroup$

Voyager's thrusters are in 3 groups:

  • 2 branches of 6 attitude control thrusters (which provide rotation around the major axes). The 2 branches provide redundancy
  • 1 set of 4 trajectory correction maneuver thrusters which were designed to provide translation. By firing them individually instead of in pairs, they can provide pitch and yaw (but not roll).

This article talks about the switch made on Voyager 1.

In the early days of the mission, Voyager 1 flew by Jupiter, Saturn, and important moons of each. To accurately fly by and point the spacecraft's instruments at a smorgasbord of targets, engineers used "trajectory correction maneuver,” or TCM, thrusters that are identical in size and functionality to the attitude control thrusters, and are located on the back side of the spacecraft. But because Voyager 1's last planetary encounter was Saturn, the Voyager team hadn't needed to use the TCM thrusters since November 8, 1980. Back then, the TCM thrusters were used in a more continuous firing mode; they had never been used in the brief bursts necessary to orient the spacecraft.

On Tuesday, Nov. 28, 2017, Voyager engineers fired up the four TCM thrusters for the first time in 37 years and tested their ability to orient the spacecraft using 10-millisecond pulses. ....

Lo and behold, on Wednesday, Nov. 29, they learned the TCM thrusters worked perfectly -- and just as well as the attitude control thrusters.

So they're switching from the attitude control thrusters to the TCM thrusters.

The plan going forward is to switch to the TCM thrusters in January. To make the change, Voyager has to turn on one heater per thruster, which requires power -- a limited resource for the aging mission. When there is no longer enough power to operate the heaters, the team will switch back to the attitude control thrusters.

The thruster test went so well, the team will likely do a similar test on the TCM thrusters for Voyager 2, the twin spacecraft of Voyager 1. The attitude control thrusters currently used for Voyager 2 are not yet as degraded as Voyager 1's, however.

What about the backup attitude control thrusters, you ask? They were already in use by 2011.

Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 are each equipped with six sets, or pairs, of thrusters to control their movement. These include three pairs of primary thrusters and three backup, or redundant, pairs. Voyager 2 is currently using the two pairs of backup thrusters that control the pitch and yaw motion of the spacecraft. Switching to the backup thruster pair that controls roll motion will allow engineers to turn off the heater that keeps the fuel line to the primary thruster warm. ...

The thrusters involved in this switch have fired more than 318,000 times. The backup pair has not been used in flight. Voyager 1 changed to the backup for this same component after 353,000 pulses in 2004 and is now using all three sets of its backup thrusters.

https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/news/details.php?article_id=98

This is the thruster layout:

You can see the Attitude Control thrusters (indicated in red) are placed in groups of 2. These are primary and backup thrusters. Labels give the thruster direction: +R and -R are roll.

The 4 thrusters indicated in blue are the Trajectory Control thrusters. enter image description here

Y are yaw, P are pitch. enter image description here

Each axis has 2 thrusters, + and -, so 6 thrusters needed to rotate around each of the 3 axes. This is one branch.

Source: a document named 'Voyager blueprint.gif', the title block identifies it as 'Mariner Jupiter Saturn '77 spacecraft mechanical configuration 6', JPL, dated 1974. I can't recall where I found this (I suspect it's from the space-modelers Yahoo group). Too large to upload here (13000x5000 px, 3.5 Mb).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! There are some interesting bits of information and links here history.nasa.gov/computers/Ch6-2.html but nothing explicit about the hardware $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jul 15 at 14:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I found something in my archive... $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Jul 15 at 19:27
  • $\begingroup$ Oh wow you did, this is gold!! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jul 15 at 23:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It turns out my initial answer was wrong, I've corrected it. $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Jul 16 at 12:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is a lot of work! This material isn't readily available, I see you've really "gone deep" to try to pull it together all in one place. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jul 16 at 12:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.