4
$\begingroup$

Liquid rockets usually use a propellant pair of fuel and oxidizer. I've seen some rockets from 1960's that used LOX/UDMH as propellant pair but why they are not used any more although it is mentioned that LOX/UDMH has higher performance than N2O4/UDMH but N2O4/ UDMH is used abundantly.

If there are any rockets with LOX/UDMH kindly mention them.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Was LOX/UDMH ever used in a staged combustion engine? $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble Aug 2 at 1:52
12
$\begingroup$

N2O4/UDMH is the choice if you need a non cryogenic storable hypergolic fuel. But UDMH is toxic and carcinogenic and should be avoided if possible. LOX/UDMH is not storable and not hypergolic.

There are a lot other fuels to be combined with LOX and they are not toxic or carcinogenic and thus easier to handle. There are combinations of LOX with higher performance than LOX/UDMH.

$\endgroup$
  • 17
    $\begingroup$ LOX/UDMH combines the worst of both worlds: the cooling infrastructure of cryogenic fuels, and the hazards of the storable hypergolics. $\endgroup$ – Dohn Joe Aug 1 at 8:48
  • $\begingroup$ @DohnJoe well said, the worst of both worlds! But there are a lot of combinations of cryogenic LOX with non cryogenic storable fuels. $\endgroup$ – Uwe Aug 1 at 8:53
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ LOX is stored below the freezing point of UDMH, which complicates your design. reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/4acvz2/… $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Aug 1 at 9:05
  • $\begingroup$ The bottom line is that there's always a Very Good Reason why They stopped using this or that high-performance fuel/oxidizer combo. Always. $\endgroup$ – RonJohn Aug 1 at 20:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.