5
$\begingroup$

I have long assumed that when a CME (aka solar mass ejection, SME) hits a spacecraft, its particles will be coming in a straight line from the Sun. I've learned recently that it isn't so direct, and many models assume an isotropic model, meaning that the particles come from all directions at the same time.

Although the magnetic field lines of the Sun bend the particles' paths, a purely isotropic distribution seems odd. Is directional shielding sufficient for CME protection for a spacecraft in interplanetary space?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Don't forget that the sun rotates (fast), so the SME will retain that velocity component $\endgroup$
    – Antzi
    Commented Aug 9, 2019 at 4:43
  • $\begingroup$ There are spacecraft at Sun-Earth L1 that have been justified (in part) by their ability to be early-warning systems. They would detect a sudden burst of protons earlier than they would arrive at Earth? e.g. Because solar particles reach L1 about an hour before Earth, PlasMag can provide a warning of 15 to 60 minutes before a coronal mass ejection (CME). I think that for the protons and other nuclei in a CME the direction should really be roughly from the Sun. For the light weight electrons, it could be a different story. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Aug 9, 2019 at 5:33
  • $\begingroup$ I really would like to know from which source you learned that the particles come from all directions at the same time. This could be so within the corona, but i just can't imagine this would be the case at the distance of Mercury, for instance. You think of a beam of plasma, with a diameter of millions of km, stretching thens of millions of km in a partical direction ? $\endgroup$
    – Cornelis
    Commented Aug 11, 2019 at 11:32
  • $\begingroup$ It started from a comment I saw on a different website. I've been having difficulty getting anything remotely reliable, but from what I can tell it will be a broad, but still very directional impact. There are a lot of small bits and pieces of papers that reference assumed isotropic distribution of particles, but there isn't a great source that I have found that shows things one way or another. $\endgroup$
    – PearsonArtPhoto
    Commented Aug 11, 2019 at 11:57
  • $\begingroup$ @uhoh Sorry, i thought inquiring minds want to know ! :) $\endgroup$
    – Cornelis
    Commented Aug 11, 2019 at 17:16

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

A single CME will impact a spacecraft from only one direction, but that direction might not be directly from the sun because a CME may zigzag en route. So unless you can know in advance from which direction it's coming, a shield just large enough to block direct solar radiation won't suffice.

The farther the spacecraft is from the sun, the smaller (and thinner) the shield you can probably get away with, though: full sphere, hemisphere, small disc.

The more technical article from 2010 in Nature that it references Propagation of an Earth-directed coronal mass ejection in three dimensions (also in ArXiv) talks about nonradial velocities and deflections based on modeling and observations from the STEREO pair of spacecraft, and uses math that's beyond me. My takeaway is that space weather is tricky, just like atmospheric weather or Mars weather.

Figure 2 from paper

$\endgroup$
1
0
$\begingroup$

Particles that come from all directions at the same time can only occur within an area of gas or plasma, the corona in this case, with a certain density.

At a certain distance outside the corona the density has become so low that the particles of the plasma don't bounce at each other anymore to change in direction and so for one point outside that greater area of plasma around the corona the particles can come only from the direction of that area.

At the distance of Mercury from the Sun the density of the plasma will certainly be that low that no bouncing at each other of particles will occur, so for interplanetary spacecraft the plasma will certainly come from one direction, i.e. the direction of the Sun.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.