2
$\begingroup$

Discussions on Boiling ponds and pools on Mars? led me to Wikipedia's Mars; Geography and naming of surface features which says:

Because Mars has no oceans and hence no "sea level", a zero-elevation surface had to be selected as a reference level; this is called the areoid124 of Mars, analogous to the terrestrial geoid. Zero altitude was defined by the height at which there is 610.5 Pa (6.105 mbar) of atmospheric pressure.125 This pressure corresponds to the triple point of water, and it is about 0.6% of the sea level surface pressure on Earth (0.006 atm).126 In practice, today this surface is defined directly from satellite gravity measurements.

124NASA (April 19, 2007). "Mars Global Surveyor: MOLA MEGDRs". geo.pds.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on November 13, 2011. Retrieved June 24, 2011.

125Zeitler, W.; Ohlhof, T.; Ebner, H. (2000). "Recomputation of the global Mars control-point network" (PDF). Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 66 (2): 155–161. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 13, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2009.

126Lunine, Cynthia J. (1999). Earth: evolution of a habitable world. Cambridge University Press. p. 183. ISBN 978-0-521-64423-5.

Question: For Mars' areoid and geoid (if there is one) or gravitational zero elevation datum:

  • How were they defined? For the areoid, how were atmospheric models near the equator and pole measured and averaged (over a day and and over a year) to establish the 610.5 Pa surface. For the gravitational zero elevation datum, how was gravity data process to choose or decide a zero altitude surface?
  • What are their shapes? Is either one spherical, or are they prolate spheroids. If so, did they have the same eccentricity or oblateness factor?
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2012GL052701 has a map of the Earth's residual geoid (RG). Mars' areoid (AR) is similar -- both supposedly linked to major impacts, and determinative of the equators. $\endgroup$ – amI Sep 30 at 9:21
  • $\begingroup$ I believe the correct terminology is geoid for all bodies. Otherwise we have an areoid, venusioid, cereoid, seleoid, hermeoid... literally ad infinitum when they are all the same thing. The point of a term like geoid is to describe a class of things, not be a distinct proper name of our Geoid. $\endgroup$ – Ags1 Sep 30 at 11:10
  • $\begingroup$ @Ags1 ya I can see Mars' geoid mentioned here and here now, but I guess that was put off by the wording of the quoted paragraph. Actually my mild diselxia led me to beleive "areoid" contained "aero-" and was used because it related to air pressure! I suppose I should rewrite this somewhat if I get a chance. Thanks for pointing that out! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Sep 30 at 11:26
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Wikipedia authors can be ridiculously overly pedantic at times. This is one of those times. The term geoid has become generic. Witness scholar.google.com/… $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Sep 30 at 13:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.