Sabre is usually described in the context of the Skylon SSTO design but, would it make more sense to use such engines for the first stage of a two stage design?

Basically, would the air breathing capability of Sabre be a worthwhile advantage over a pure rocket to perform the launch to the upper atmosphere phase in a staged design.

(Presuming the full recovery of the mooted Sabre first stage, here).


1 Answer 1


The Reaction Engines Ltd (REL) web site has this to say:

"The resulting increased system performance enables aircraft-like horizontal take-off and landing operations, which reduce cost, infrastructure, and mission timelines while increasing responsiveness and system reusability. SABRE class engines are applicable in both multi-stage and single-stage architectures."

REL have been distancing themselves from SSTO as the first application for several years - you'll be hard pressed to find any mention of Skylon on their site now. A 30th Anniversary tweet showed a badge/patch including their current TSTO concept -- complete with (the other sort of) aerospike:

TSTO 30 years

They have participated in a number of studies using SABRE engines as the first stage, including those with the Air Force Research Laboratories AFRL SABRE TSTO fully reusable

and Paris University/CNES

SABRE TSTO options

Latest REL TSTO concept : REL TSTO concept 2019


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.