Instead the body would be kept from boiling by a thin layer of water that was held down by oxygen up at the head. 1 gallon of water is 8lbs which per inch is what the latest spacesuit is designed to operate at using oxygen (

) could water achieve that same weight while reducing the form factor? Perhaps more or less than 1 gallon depending on the size of the astronaut but it would all be held down below the head by pressurized oxygen in the helmet.

  • 23
    $\begingroup$ "hold down" would not work in zero gravity. $\endgroup$
    – Uwe
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 7:49
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ If we could, what would be the benefit? Why would we want to do that? $\endgroup$
    – Peteris
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 12:28
  • 12
    $\begingroup$ You could just eliminate the water altogether. Just a suit that holds your body together. Helmet on top and all good. Now if someone could just work out the bugs... $\endgroup$
    – JRE
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 12:30
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ That seems like a bad idea. Now you have two separate gas systems, and if the neck collar leaks, you have sudden nitrogen asphyxiation, which will happen with absolutely no warning whatsoever. What problem exactly would this solve? $\endgroup$
    – Tristan
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 14:12
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ What is this "down" of which you speak? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 3:25

8 Answers 8


There's no advantage to replacing the air with water.

  • you're adding weight.
  • you're adding resistance: when you move around, water will flow around the body and because you're proposing a thin layer of water, the flow is obstructed which means it takes energy to push the water around.
  • you're replacing the air layer (which is a reasonably good thermal insulator) with water (which is an excellent conductor) which means you need more heating/cooling capacity (=heavier backpack) and/or better insulation (which means the suit gets thicker).
  • you want some space between the astronaut and the suit, to prevent abrasion. Making the suit smaller makes it more difficult to design a comfortable suit.
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For a suit, it is useless, but a spacecraft cockpit could be filled with water to reduce the effects of g forces. $\endgroup$
    – qazwsx
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 15:50
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @qazwsx - but at the cost of requiring the entire cockpit to withstand forces equivalent to several atmospheres of pressure. The common spacecraft solution is quite similar to that used in fighter aircraft, where the cockpit pressure differential to the surround air is often relatively low and the pilot wears an anti-g suit. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 21:01
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Not to mention what could happen when a bit of the water leaks into the electronics :-) $\endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 3:39
  • $\begingroup$ "G-forces" refer to inertia rather than gravity. Filling the cockpit with anything heavier than air is just adding mass. It would do nothing to lessen inertia and would be problematic. Imagine a ton of water mass behind you in a relatively easy 3-G turn: 3 tons pressing against you (oof!). We could use inertia dampers , of course, but they don't exist yet. $\endgroup$
    – Suncat2000
    Commented Oct 18, 2019 at 18:05

...a thin layer of water that was held down by oxygen up at the head.

"Held down" doesn't work so well in weightlessness. Water would move around inside the suit, climb up the astronaut's neck and put them in danger.

This happened to ESA astronaut Luca Parmitano when doing a space walk at the ISS. See Space.com's Italian Astronaut Recounts Near-Drowning in Spacesuit (Video)

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I started to write a new question Where did the water come from, but the second video in the Space.com explains it was a leak in the ventilation system. $\endgroup$
    – user10509
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 14:18

There has been active research into EVA suits where the body is protected from vacuum just from the suit itself being very tight, rather than being inflated with a fluid such as air or water. They are generally known as Mechanical Counterpressure Suits (MCS), or Space Activity Suits due to the promise of increased mobility.

Such suits are very promising. However, there are a few bugs to work out:

  • Humans change shape.
  • Armpits suck.
  • The interface between the suit and the helmet is prone to failure.
  • Can't wear diapers.

In order to be effective, a gasless pressure suit needs to provide constant pressure across the skin. Fortunately, they don't need to provide the pressure on every millimeter of skin; merely every few centimeters of skin. Early designs looked like rubber skin suits that were molded right on the wearer. Current designs, such as the MIT Bio-Suit, look like spandex wrapped with a mile of thin bungee cords, as in the image below.

MIT Bio-Suit next to a Mars Mark III Planetary Hard Suit (NASA [Public Domain]) (Credit: NASA [Public Domain])

The first problem with this design (and especially older MCSes that were made from molded rubber) is that the human body changes shape significantly in microgravity, because our bodies are evolved to move fluids upwards. Our chest and head get larger, while our legs get skinnier... and over time, our bodies lose about 20% of the total water volume due to overpressure of fluids in our upper bodies. We also grow taller over the first few weeks in microgravity.

The bungees of the MIT Bio-Suit are adjustable, but looking at some of the more complex shapes of the human body, it is very tedious to adjust all of the bungees. Instead of starting to don an EVA suit only 2 hours before leaving the airlock, you would have to take an entire day to custom fit it, THEN take the normal 2 hours the morning of the EVA.

There is one region on every human body that can not be fully protected from the vacuum of space with an MCS: The armpits.

Armpits are just too concave.

There are also regions of the male anatomy that suffer some other interesting topological problems.

The armpits can be mitigated with an inflatable bladder in each side. This will reduce mobility, but will keep the astronaut from some serious hickies. The other topological problems will have to be solved with tape. Perhaps the space programs could enlist the expert advice of drag performers in this regard, or not allow people with certain body parts to perform EVAs in an MCS.

The next issue is how to put a breathable atmosphere on someone's face without also filling up the rest of the suit.

The whole point of an MCS is to provide constant pressure to the skin of a flexible human. That means that the MCS can not be rigid. However, in order to let the astronaut breath and open their eyes (much less see through the helmet's visor), they need a rigid helmet to contain some air.

If you connect the helmet to the MCS at the shoulders, then any time the astronaut raises their arms, their shoulders flex, and the air tight seal fails.

If you connect the helmet at the neck, you have a rigid ring around your neck and can't swallow (this can get very dangerous in case of saliva buildup, and is very uncomfortable anyways). It may prevent the astronaut from talking if it interferes with their larynx, and could cut off circulation to the head, especially if their blood pressure starts climbing.

If you connect the helmet at the jaw, the astronaut will be unable to open their mouth without the air tight seal failing (or will just be unable to open their mouth at all). They will be unable to talk and may have a hard time swallowing.

If you try to connect the helmet above the mouth, they'll be at extreme risk of injury if they try to open their mouth... Definitely won't be able to talk in that case.

And the last problem: Astronauts on EVA wear diapers.

Looking at the MIT Bio-Suit, and the many bungees in that area, it won't be possible for an astronaut to wear a diaper. They'd have to have a catheter.

And no, you can't just hold it. EVAs typically last 8 hours. They are also working in harsh conditions, so need to stay hydrated.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ From what I've read, the current solution to the armpit problem is to have a pouch there that fills with a gel, like the stuff they put in bicycle saddles, which would provide pressure on the armpit when needed, and squidge out of the way (into elasticated channels along the sides of the ribs and under the arm, presumably) when the arm moves. A similar solution could be employed for other problematic areas... this may be uncomfortable (especially for those with the male anatomy that you mentioned) but it would probably work. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 10:03
  • $\begingroup$ For the helmet, what if most of the head was encased in the suit, and just the face area was covered with a pressurized mask? It doesn't have to be a horizontal seal. On the other hand, I suppose you'd still have the problem of where/how to run the connection - under the chin probably makes the most sense, but would probably be uncomfortable and make talking hard. $\endgroup$
    – Bobson
    Commented Oct 18, 2019 at 2:03
  • $\begingroup$ Why would you even need a seal between the helmet and the suit? If the mechanical pressure of the suit is slightly higher than the air pressure in the helmet, the air will not inflate the suit, but stay in the helmet. Or do I miss something? $\endgroup$
    – alain
    Commented Oct 18, 2019 at 12:59
  • $\begingroup$ @alain: The point of an MCS is that it isn't airtight. It protects from the vacuum of space by putting mechanical pressure on the skin instead of atmospheric pressure. If you don't have a seal, then your breathing air escapes and your lungs are a bit more sensitive to loss of pressure than your skin is. $\endgroup$
    – Ghedipunk
    Commented Oct 18, 2019 at 15:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, that's also what I thought would be the worst drawback of traditional suits, and the motivation to develop an MCS suit. But I still don't see why they couldn't be made airtight at the same time to avoid the sealing problems. $\endgroup$
    – alain
    Commented Oct 18, 2019 at 16:57

The problem is how you would keep the water at the bottom and the oxygen at the top. In gravity environments such as Earth or Mars, the water would understandably tend to gather at the bottom and the oxygen at the top, due to buoyancy. This is fine, of course, and what you would expect. But what else would happen?

Your astronaut in such a suit can't even bend over without the water sloshing up into their helmet, let alone enter a weightless/free fall environment.

Could you compartmentalize the air and the water so that each is sealed from the other? Perhaps you could, but with what? I don't know any astronaut who wants a tight clamp choking their neck while they are doing important Science stuff.

  • $\begingroup$ The type of flexible rubber collars used on diving dry-suits should work to separate the suit water from the helmet air. $\endgroup$
    – Mike H
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 2:19
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @MikeH: Water is incompressible. As the astronaut changes position, bending limbs, the total volume of the spacesuit changes. Air gets compressed. Water would get squeezed into air-occupied segments. You'd need some separate buffer container to accept excess water, other than the helmet. Plus how to fill and empty the suit when donning it, without causing spills all over the station? $\endgroup$
    – SF.
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 6:10
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @MikeH True, but a leak in a dry-suit seal is nothing more than an annoyance. Your clothes will get wet, and worst-case you might have to call off the dive if you get cold. A seal leak in this hypothetical spacesuit would be almost immediately fatal. $\endgroup$
    – Graham
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 13:36

If your interest is reducing form factor then you should look in to mechanical counterpressure suits. As the name implies, these apply mechanical pressure to the human body to prevent expansion.

One such suit is the MIT Bio-Suit, which may be used for the Mars mission.

MIT Bio Suit next to the Mars Mark III planetary hard suit.

MIT Bio Suit next to the Mars Mark III planetary hard suit.


Wouldn't that be a bit impractical as the astronaut would be swimming in water. Unless I'm missing something, also their fingers and toes would look like raisins after the space walk. Getting in and out of it would be a mess too, with the water escaping and getting everywhere.

  • $\begingroup$ Water or any liquid would just be for pressure and radiation protection so a waterproof sleeve would separate skin from water then an outer suit would separate water from space. Unlike air water is less compressible so you can accomplish the same purpose with lower footprint while providing equal pressure, radiation protection, and other purposes. Zero bubbles and separating water from oxygen at the head would be mandatory and must be accounted for however pure oxygen at the head would last longer than if the entire body was in air in case of a scrubber failure or leak. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 20:30

Another consideration is that air is breathable and contains oxygen which is somewhat useful for respiration.

Having a suit filled with air will provide a small reserve of air in case the life support systems have problems.

Also, getting in and out will be a lot messier if the astronaut has to get into a "bath" rather than into a suit.

  • $\begingroup$ Air with about 80 % nitrogen and 20 % oxygen requires a pressure of at least 0.8 bar to be breathable. But a suit with a pressure of 0.8 to 1 bar is too stiff and inflexible to be useful. A small reserve of air mixed with too much of exhaled carbon dioxide is not helpful. $\endgroup$
    – Uwe
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 19:19

It can't be full of liquid either, à la: The Abyss. "Despite some recent advances in liquid ventilation, a standard mode of application has not yet been established."

A significant problem, however, arises from the high viscosity of the liquid and the corresponding reduction in its ability to remove CO2. All uses of liquid breathing for diving must involve total liquid ventilation (see [link]). Total liquid ventilation, however, has difficulty moving enough liquid to carry away CO2, because no matter how great the total pressure is, the amount of partial CO2 gas pressure available to dissolve CO2 into the breathing liquid can never be much more than the pressure at which CO2 exists in the blood (about 40 mm of mercury (Torr)).

  • $\begingroup$ Agreed, liquid breathing would be inapplicable. However liquid pressure on the lungs below the next would equal gas pressure at the head above the neck even if they were separate so there would be no different feeling if the entire body was in gas pressure however volume would be much lower. It would also demand a solution to adequately scrub the gas at the head of Co2 so the spacewalk could last as long as a volumetric gas suit. That already has been solved largely by dry suits and rebreathers in SCUBA which certainly don't depend on the entire body's surface area to store breathable air. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 26, 2019 at 2:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.