update 1: NASA wants ideas for keeping Moon missions powered in the dark
update 2: NASA’s Artemis Rover to Land Near Nobile Region of Moon’s South Pole which is informative here
Source NASA
TechCrunch's NASA’s VIPER lunar rover will hunt water on the Moon in 2022 says:
VIPER is a limited-time mission; operating at the poles means there’s no sunlight to harvest with solar panels, so the rover will carry all the power it needs to last about a hundred days there. That’s longer than the U.S. has spent on the Moon’s surface in a long time — although China has for the last few years been actively deploying rovers all over the place.
yet the image there and in the NASA.gov's Moon-to-Mars feature page it links to; New VIPER Lunar Rover to Map Water Ice on the Moon show solar panels, suggesting that if the hundred-day power source is rechargeable, it could be recharged by going back to wherever those obvious solar panels were used.
Question: What is the VIPER lunar rover's 100-day power source, and why can't it recharge it using its solar panels?
Please cite authoritative sources and not just a blurb in a popular news outlet. My question was inspired by a confusing and potentially self-inconsistent blurb in a popular news outlet, but I'm looking for an authoritative and reliable resolution to this conflict. Thanks!