So that they are not as visible? I assume the SpaceX engineers have considered this option.


They have said that they will mitigate the reflectivity of the satellites in future batches and that the 1.0 launch, Nov 11 they did not complete that for this batch.

In the December 2019 launch they plan to test darkening one of the satellites to see if it meets their needs.

(chief operating officer Gwynne) Shotwell said the next batch has one satellite “where we put a coating on the bottom.” She noted that this is just an experiment and could not predict if it will work. “We’re do trial and error to figure out the best way to get this done,” said Shotwell.

[...] The coating that is being applied to one of the satellites in the third batch of Starlinks is just the first step toward finding a permanent solution as more satellites get deployed. Shotwell said the company plans to launch batches of 60 satellites every two to three weeks over the next year to build the constellation that by mid 2020 will be ready to provide global coverage.

[...] The experimental coating that would make the satellite less reflective could affect its performance, so that is something that will be examined, said Shotwell. “It definitely changes the performance of the satellite, thermally. It’ll be some trial and error but we’ll fix it.

As if addressing the "I assume the SpaceX engineers have considered this option." part of the question (and not everyone will believe this):

Shotwell admitted that nobody in the company anticipated the problem when the satellites were first designed.

No one thought of this,” she said. “We didn’t think of it. The astronomy community didn’t think of it.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'll give you the 'unsourced' part (but SpaceX tends to provide the most crappy public statements possible in the form of Twitter comments), but the answer absolutely does address both "can" and "should". You're being overly critical. $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Nov 13 '19 at 9:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Hobbes respectfully disagree. "mitigate" could be anything from 0.5% to 99.5% reduction. $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft Nov 13 '19 at 14:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh Added a link I found. $\endgroup$ – geoffc Dec 8 '19 at 0:04
  • $\begingroup$ I've added some quotes that address the question to avoid the possibility of link-only-ness. Thanks for the follow-up! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Dec 8 '19 at 0:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.