1
$\begingroup$

This answer to Does NASA really report the power of rockets in horsepower? cites NASA news item Space Launch System Booster Aimed and Ready to Fire which says

"What's impressive about this test is when ignited, the booster will be operating at about 3.6 million pounds of thrust, or 22 million horsepower," said Alex Priskos, manager of the SLS Boosters Office at Marshall. "This test firing is critical to enable validation of our design."

If I said my car was operating at 400 Nm or 200 kW you'd balk because of the "or" which suggests that these are two ways to say the same thing. You can use "and" because you'd be measuring two different pieces of information. They may be related but you cant' simply get one from the other.

And yet here is 3.6 million pounds of thrust, or 22 million horsepower.

Questions:

  1. While it wouldn't make physical sense, how can we arrive at something like 6 hp/lbf for the SLS booster?
  2. Is this very roughly an invariant? Would all large boosters be within a factor of two of this number, or at least boosters of a similar propellant type?

update: @OrganicMarble has pointed to @MarkAdler's answer which explains a definition and provides a link to a calculator in Wolfram Alpha. When I enter 3.6 million pounds of thrust I get back 48 million hp, which is over a factor of two higher than the 22 million horsepower mentioned above.

Somebody is wrong, or there are multiple definitions, or maybe I didn't use the calculator properly...?

$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ Does this answer your question? What is the relation between the rocket equation and work, energy and power? $\endgroup$ Mar 7 '20 at 14:46
  • $\begingroup$ @OrganicMarble Did you check to see if that produces 6 hp/lbf ? I've cited a specific number here, just because there's an equation there doesn't mean that it works, no matter how right Mark Adler invariably and always is :-) $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Mar 7 '20 at 14:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I believe that the question I suggested is a duplicate and that the answer given is correct. That's why I don't get all the pushback. I still think it's a duplicate but I'm retracting my close vote since you edited the question to ask about the specific number. I suggest you search the site for possible duplicates before posting questions in the future. A simple search for "horsepower" would have turned that up. $\endgroup$ Mar 7 '20 at 15:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Did you account for the SRBs having a specific impulse of only about 240 s? $\endgroup$ Mar 7 '20 at 20:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. $\endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    Mar 9 '20 at 13:02
1
$\begingroup$

tl;dr: A complete answer is going to need more information and insight because available Isp values don't generate the quoted value for the SLS's SRB's "rocket horsepower". Currently it seems that somebody is wrong somewhere and I'd be happy if it can be shown to be me!


The question links to @MarkAdler's answer which explains that one could define the power of a rocket as the rate that kinetic energy is imparted to its exhaust in the frame of reference moving with the rocket.

We know kinetic energy $E$ is $m v^2/2$ and that relative to the rocket the effective or average exhaust velocity is close to $I_{sp}$ in seconds times one standard gravity defined to be exactly 9.80665 m/s2. Thus in the frame of the rocket the power $P$ will be:

$$\frac{dE}{dt} = P = \frac{v^2}{2}\frac{dm}{dt}$$

Since thrust $T$ is

$$T = v \frac{dm}{dt}$$

and $v$ is $g I_{sp}$, we get

$$P = \frac{g I_{sp} T}{2}.$$

In this frame we can use $F = dp/dt = v dm/dt$ and don't need the $m dv/dt$ term necessary in inertial coordinates as is required to derive the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation.

The reason that the the OP got 48 million horsepower instead of something closer to 22 million is that while they entered the correct thrust into the Wolfram Alpha calculator link they left the $I_{sp}$ value alone, mistakenly thinking that the booster in question was a stand-alone launch vehicle instead of an SRB as was pointed out in comments:

Did you account for the SRBs having a specific impulse of only about 240 s?

Putting that in as well, it returns 25.3 million horsepower which is close enough to 22 million for government work. Conversely we can estimate that 22 million horsepower would correspond to a sea level Isp of about 209 seconds.

If NASA's SLS Boosters Office used the simple formula above, then it means that they've used 209 seconds for Isp rather than 240 seconds. However Wikipedia says 269 seconds!

There is a discrepancy that needs further explanation.

Wolfram Alpha calculator for "rocket horsepower" input

Wolfram Alpha calculator for "rocket horsepower" output

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.