3
$\begingroup$

If I want to make a communication satellite, like MarCO, what formulas do I need to calculate the perfect antenna? Is there a difference between the X-Band and the classic UHF? If the cubesat is destined for some saturn moon, does it have to have a larger antenna due to the interference of its other moons? How do I receive the antenna information?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ This is not a duplicate but you may find some helpful information in answers to How does the pattern on the MarCo cubesat's antenna boost data-transmission? $\endgroup$ – uhoh Mar 8 '20 at 23:11
  • $\begingroup$ If you want to a large high gain low beam width antenna dish, you need a precise attitude control of your cubesat. If the directional antenna is not oriented precisely to the Earth, communication is lost. $\endgroup$ – Uwe Mar 11 '20 at 11:41
3
$\begingroup$

There are too many general questions here that require book-chapter-length-like answers. I would like to specify first:

  1. Do you want to calculate antenna performance, antenna pattern, or what exactly? Additionally, which antenna do you have in mind: ground station antenna for an uplink scenario, antenna on-board of the CubeSat for a downlink? In terms of performance, I would suggest to look for such calculation generalization as a link budget, as by calculating solely the antenna performance you won't be able to say if you can successfully close the link with your planned CubeSat. There are tons of examples in Internet and scientific publications, thus I advise you to review those first. For instance, this presentation will give you a good feeling what link budget is.

  2. There is, of course, difference between bands. X-band is a frequency band between 7 to 11.2 GHz, while UHF is between 300 MHz and 1 GHz. In terms what frequency suits your mission in a best way, it is again quite broad question. It really breaks down to the mission requirements and subjected towards thorough trade-off analysis.

  3. Larger antennas on CubeSats (and satellites in general) are nothing to do with interference. The main advantage of a larger antenna (let's assume parabolic reflector) is the larger gain. What is gain? See here.

  4. You, of course, can do some engineering assumptions regarding your antenna when doing your link budget calculations. However, without prior knowledge of state-of-the-art or specific antenna device in mind, it is a hard task. Considering the desired deep-space scenario, I would recommend you to do a thorough literature research, check the flight heritage of successful missions, what kind of communication strategies they used. Having the previous experiences in mind, you can start an iteration process where you combine all the elements of your communication scenario into a link budget calc and see what kind of resources would you need to successfully close the link. This process would take a while, as it is considered to be a compromise between the desired performance, available power resources and current state of the technology.

But again, I advise you to make some effort and provide us with some rather more specific questions. So far there are so many ambiguities in your question that you cannot expect anyone would provide you with precise answer.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Its an antenna for a cubesat 1U, for a communication network betwen Titan and the earth $\endgroup$ – Valentino Zaffrani Mar 9 '20 at 16:28
  • $\begingroup$ @ValentinoZaffrani What about the transmitter power of the cubesat, what are the expected datarates for downlink and uplink? What about the antenna and transmitter and receiver used on Earth? $\endgroup$ – Uwe Mar 9 '20 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ A RTL-SDR on onmnidirectional and with eight all connected betwen, if we send a prove to mars, and do the same we have a full time communication $\endgroup$ – Valentino Zaffrani Mar 9 '20 at 20:49
  • $\begingroup$ How is marco-earth communication? What band? And marco-mars? $\endgroup$ – Valentino Zaffrani Mar 9 '20 at 20:50
  • $\begingroup$ @ValentinoZaffrani Uwe pointed out some important assumptions (in addition to those in my answer) that you should define first. You are asking ambiguous questions and instead of clarification to you initial questions, are just starting to ask even more ambiguous questions. Please, write a comprehensive description of your problem and we will try to figure something out. In addition, you can yourself find tons of information regarding MarCO and its communication scenario. Google scholar and researchgate are your friends for that! $\endgroup$ – prop-a-gator Mar 10 '20 at 10:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.