This answer to Delta-v for landing on the moon estimates that to go from a circular orbit at 110km to a landing on a spherical Moon would require an absolute minimum of 1736 m/s and the Apollo landers budgeted about 20% more for more realistic landings.

25 m/s is used to change the circular orbit into an elliptical orbit which intersects the surface, and the rest at the last moments in a "suicide burn" to reduce velocity to zero on touchdown.

Suppose I wanted to land on top of the most challenging lunar mass concentration or mascon. Over time, mascons have brought spacecraft crashing into the Moon because their locally higher gravity fields perturbs their orbits, making them more eccentric until they intercept the surface. Their effect is a little bit like small, inward-pointing radial impulses discussed in this answer.

radial impulse to a circular orbit

Question: It it possible to roughly estimate based on the sizes and strengths of lunar mascons what the delta-v penalty would be for safely landing on, or just past (downrange) of the biggest lunar mascon? Would it for example require an additional 1 or 10 or 100 m/s to counteract the higher local gravity?

fyi: I've just asked How can I make a Python function return the Moon's gravitational force in a form I can use to calculate orbits? in Earth Science SE, if there's anything helpful I'll update here.

I also wonder if there is a faulty premise in my question. Could a carefully choreographed orbit use several passes (over time) to use the mascon in a constructive way to do some of the work of that 25 m/s transfer to the surface-intersecting elliptical orbit? Would it in fact require less delta-v than to land elsewhere somehow?

These maps of the moon show gravity anomalies measured by NASA's GRAIL mission. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/CSM)

These maps of the moon show gravity anomalies measured by NASA's GRAIL mission. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/CSM)

From Space.com's Mystery of Moon's Lumpy Gravity Explained, click for full size.

The Bouguer anomaly plots show elevated gravity as much as about 600 mGal. Wikipedia's Gal (unit) explains what this means; 0.6 Gal is 0.006 m/s^2 or almost a half of a percent of the Moon's average gravity, and they extend over quite large distances.

The gal (symbol: Gal), sometimes called galileo after Galileo Galilei, is a unit of acceleration used extensively in the science of gravimetry. The gal is defined as 1 centimeter per second squared (1 cm/s2). The milligal (mGal) and microgal (µGal) are respectively one thousandth and one millionth of a gal.

  • $\begingroup$ different but related: How much harder is it to land on the Moon away from the equator and the poles? $\endgroup$ – uhoh Apr 6 at 2:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please notice that the gravitatory field from mascons is tiny compared to the overall gravitatory field of the Moon. They perturb orbits in the long term but their effect on a single orbit is small. Therefore, landing on a mascon is not going to be very different than landing on a different point of the Moon under the same orbit. $\endgroup$ – Pere Apr 18 at 8:42
  • $\begingroup$ @Pere that's right, I've mentioned that it's about a half of a percent. Whether you call half of a percent "large" or "small", the effect on a trajectory can still be calculated. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Apr 18 at 9:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.