It seems that a nuclear thermoelectric generator was used to power spacecrafts for some exploration missions. Can a thermopile that harvest the light/shade temperature difference on Earth's orbit be used to power a small satellite? What about a Mercury satellite, would it be more reliable and efficient than solar panels which could melt on those conditions?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ MESSENGER's solar panels haven't melted. $\endgroup$
    – Mark Adler
    Apr 27, 2014 at 2:58

1 Answer 1


There's no theoretical reason why not. The main reason why they aren't used is practical: the best solar panels convert about 22% of available energy to electricity, while the best thermoelectric generators operate at about 8% of Carnot efficiency, which for a reasonable temperature gradient works out to converting about 4% of available energy.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.