16
$\begingroup$

The pressure in the Space Shuttle's main engines must be very high to get the vehicle off the ground (with the SRB assist, of course). With such high pressures inside the engine, how do you inject fuel into the engine? I understand that the fuel is passed around the engine so that it cools the nozzle, so that the exhaust doesn't melt it, then into the engine. However I always assumed that the pressure of the fuel going into the engine must be higher than the pressure the exhaust gases exert. If so, how does the Shuttle pump such high pressure fuel into the engines?

$\endgroup$
10
$\begingroup$

This is complicated, but here is the gist:

Thrust is generated by flowing high pressure gas into a lower pressure environment. This flow is supersonic, so what goes on downstream of the throat (top of the the nozzle) cannot be sensed by what is going on in the combustion chamber (sound is just a pressure wave). The nozzle is supersonic, the combustion chamber is subsonic. The nozzle expands the gas to create the high stagnation pressure required -- mostly by increasing the velocity of the gas. Note that stagnation pressure (the value you are thinking of) is not just static pressure -- it also includes a velocity component.

So in summary, the the Shuttle doesn't have to pump fuel and oxidizer into the combustion engine at a pressure higher than that at the nozzle exit because:

  • No pressure information is transmitted back from the nozzle exit to the combustion chamber due to the supersonic flow in the nozzle.
  • A large portion of the nozzle's exit pressure (stagnation pressure) is from the velocity of the gases -- velocity created by expanding the supersonic gas flow.
  • Fuel and oxidizer is pressurized however to some degree by turbopumps to insure positive delivery into the combustion chamber.

Hope this helps. Propulsion is a very complicated field.

Update: The main combustion chamber pressure on the SSMEs at full power is approximately 3,008 pounds per square inch.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So then, the opposite reaction force is exerted on the nozzle not at the top of the combustion chamber? $\endgroup$ – user39 Jul 19 '13 at 21:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, I believe the thrust reaction goes through the nozzle walls. In fact, you can effectively gimble the thrust of a rocket nozzle by inducing boundary layer separation on one side of the nozzle, thus rotating the thrust vector. $\endgroup$ – Erik Jul 19 '13 at 21:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you have a 3D printer, perhaps this will help: 3dcadbrowser.com/download.aspx?3dmodel=14607 $\endgroup$ – Erik Jul 19 '13 at 21:12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I don't think that's quite right. The pressure in the combustion chamber must be higher than the pressure in the nozzle bell otherwise the flow of propellant through the throat would be reversed. There is consistent loss of both static and stagnation pressure from turbopumps to exit plane. In fact, without a significant 2–3× ratio of pressures across the throat the flow won't choke at all. The turbopumps on the SSMEs exist precisely because if they didn't the engine would produce effectively no thrust. $\endgroup$ – Adam Wuerl Sep 6 '13 at 21:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The flow in the nozzle is supersonic -- therefore no pressure information gets past the throat from the nozzle. That doesn't mean that you don't need turbopumps though -- you still have pressure to overcome in the combustion chamber. $\endgroup$ – Erik Sep 6 '13 at 22:07
11
$\begingroup$

The SSME is a staged-combustion rocket engine, which means that some small fraction of the propellant flow into the main combustion chamber is first diverted into a small pre-burner (two actually). These preburners combust (relatively) small amounts of fuel and oxidizer to produce hot exhaust gas which is expanded through a turbine, which is mechanically connected to a pump (hence turbopump), which is used to supply high-pressure fuel and oxidizer to the main combustion chamber.

The actual engine is significantly more complicated than this (even in a simplified schematic), but this is the basic premise of any turbopump-fed engine: hot gas turns a turbopump that pumps up the main propellant supply and injects it into the combustion chamber. The SSME has lots of other little details, like high and low pressure pumps, and feeding the combustion gasses back into the main chamber—rather than venting them overboard as the RS-68 does.

But the bottom line is that the OP is right. The pressure is very high in the combustion chamber, you inject propellant into the combustion chamber by having an even higher pressure at the outlet of the turbopumps. Store in the tanks at lower pressure, pump up with the turbos, then ride the pressure gradient all the way to the bright blue light at the end of the nozzle.

SSME schematic courtesy Wikipedia.

If you want a better understanding of why the propellant needs to be at high pressure in the first place.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Here's an amazing detail. In the SSME, the exhaust from both fuel turbine and oxidizer turbine go into the combustion chamber. That means the pressure in the preburners which drives the turbines is much higher than the main combustion chamber pressure. So how do you inject the fuel and oxidizer into the preburners? With very high pressure. There are actually 3 oxidizer pumps: low pressure, high pressure, and preburner. $\endgroup$ – Philip Ngai Feb 6 '18 at 21:35
1
$\begingroup$

Just to add a bit of perspective. The high pressure fuel turbo-pump operates with a power of about 69,000 HP, and the ox is 25,000 HP http://www.rocket.com/space-shuttle-main-engine. So, just pumping high pressure cryogenics takes ~100,000 HP on each shuttle engine. (On the order of 500-1000 cars engines)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy