8
$\begingroup$

As mentioned briefly in this question, The Russian Soyuz has been using a sub-4 hour path to ISS. Why the long ride from Canaveral? Or is the 19-hour timeframe typical of all launches prior to the "Express" Soyuz methood?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Shuttle usually had a Flight Day 3 docking. $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble May 28 at 14:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you drive as fast as possible on your first driving license road test? $\endgroup$ – user3528438 May 28 at 17:21
  • $\begingroup$ @user3528438 You haven't driven in Massachusetts, have you :-) $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft May 29 at 11:03
7
$\begingroup$

To achieve a 4 hour docking time, you have to really have everything working perfectly. Crew Dragon is still a very experimental spacecraft, and won't do such a quick docking for a few reasons. Of some note, the first mission took around 26 hours to dock with the ISS after launch.

  1. They will want to test the various systems prior to docking, making sure that everything is working perfectly. Some of these things can't be done at the ISS. Checking that comms are working well, thrusters, etc, all will be done. Keep in mind, the main goal of the mission is to ensure the spacecraft works right, they will have to check those things out, especially the ones that require humans in the loop.
  2. The exact accuracy of orbital injection, etc isn't super precisely known yet. In order to do a 4 hour dock, you have to have a nearly perfect insertion. Some Soyuz missions have been delayed to as long as 2 days when the insertion isn't perfect.
  3. They will just want to take things slow in general, to make sure that rushing things doesn't lead to a new problem, etc.
  4. The crew will have been up for a long period of time. They will want to let the crew rest before doing the highly sensitive docking maneuver.

They may be able to dock sooner, but this is the first mission, they are going to take things slow. Also of some note, the planned timeline to orbit requires 3 major burns performed on orbit. Roughly half of the time is spent coasting after the final major burn, the other half is spent waiting for the best time for the 3 major burns.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is there any reason not to target a 4 hour rndz and fault down to a longer one if something isn't "working perfectly"? Re: 2) is there any reason to expect something different from what happened on Demo-1? 4) Isn't the docking automatic? And, is all this just your opinion, or do you have sources? $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble May 28 at 14:53
  • $\begingroup$ It's not just a matter of fault finding. Keep in mind, this mission's primary goal is to make sure the spacecraft works. There's a lot of things they can't do when they are docked that they need to demonstrate that they work. The first mission actually took 26 hours to dock with the ISS. The docking may be automatic, but there isn't a chance that the astronauts on board will be sleeping when it happens, they will be monitoring in case they need to take over. $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto May 28 at 18:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Great stuff! Any references? $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble May 28 at 18:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Added a few, and some more material. Most of this is based off of my experience with similar programs. $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto May 28 at 18:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For that, take a look at the timeline. everydayastronaut.com/crew-dragon-timeline The docking itself is about 2 hours. Most of it is spent in a pretty different orbit. $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto May 28 at 18:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.