4
$\begingroup$

If there was a satellite that had a periapsis at 250km, approximately how much delta-v would it take during each orbit to offset the atmospheric drag? Would it be different depending on apoapsis?

The idea is for a satellite to go through and pick up debris and then release it at periapsis

Putting it at 250km ensures that any debris will be removed and if the satellite brakes apart its debris will be removed as well.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Would be different depending on the ballistic coefficient i.e. how large and how aerodynamically slim is it? $\endgroup$ – Deer Hunter May 5 '14 at 12:25
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @DeerHunter - That's correct. The answer depends on the shape and size of the vehicle. It also depends on the year (the upper atmosphere swells during solar max, shrinks during solar min), solar flux (the Sun has hiccoughs even during solar min), local time of day at periapsis (the upper atmosphere has a diurnal bulge), the season (the upper atmosphere varies with the seasons), the latitude (and also with latitude). There is no one answer. The variations are orders of magnitude. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen May 5 '14 at 12:45
  • $\begingroup$ What about the delta-V associated with grabbing debris with a different orbital velocity? $\endgroup$ – DJohnM May 5 '14 at 22:08
  • $\begingroup$ Catprog, with your new edit there's even more unknowns. If you "release" debris at perigee of an eccentric orbit, the debris will retain same velocity as your craft and unless they have a much higher drag coefficient to slow them down faster than your craft, will merely follow its orbit all the way to apogee and so on. There's also a question of the weight ratio and where debris would be collected from. E.g. what do you mean with "release at periapsis"? Shoot them in the negative to your velocity vector somehow to reduce their orbital speed while increasing that of the craft? $\endgroup$ – TildalWave May 5 '14 at 22:15
  • $\begingroup$ The idea is the craft will boost to retain velocity. I am just trying to get an idea of how much boost is required. $\endgroup$ – Catprog May 6 '14 at 6:51
4
$\begingroup$

The retrograde delta-v that the spacecraft will receive from atmospheric drag depends on two things: the mass of the spacecraft and the force of drag. (And the drag force will be integrated over the all of the time that the spacecraft is in the atmosphere.)

The drag force, in turn, depends on four things:

  • The velocity of the spacecraft
  • The cross-sectional area of the spacecraft (i.e., how much of the spacecraft the air is "dragging against")
  • The density of the air
  • The drag coefficient of the spacecraft

Spacecraft velocity will depend entirely on orbital characteristics, and air density will depend on altitude as well as time of day and climate/Sun conditions. And, in turn, the drag coefficient will add additional dependencies on the object's shape and the viscosity of the air.

Would it be different depending on apoapsis?

As you go through the atmosphere, many of the properties above will change, and based on the orbit, your velocity at different parts of the orbit, as well as what parts of the atmosphere you're passing through, will change as well. With a fixed perigee, the position of your apogee will determine the overall shape of the orbit, which will change all of these factors. So yes, the acceleration due to drag that the spacecraft experiences will vary drastically depending on the orbit.

In short, you'll need to specify more characteristics of the orbit in order for your question to be answered properly. However, it's possible to approximate an answer to the question if you assume a circular orbit (i.e., apogee distance = perigee distance) and make lots of assumptions about the shape of your craft.

If we go by the tables at the end of Space Mission Analysis and Design, if you have a spacecraft that has 50kg of mass per square meter of cross-sectional area, and you're in a 250km circular orbit, then you must impart a delta-v of between 636 m/s and 2,002 m/s each year (depending on solar activity) in order to maintain altitude; i.e., you can lose that much delta-v during the course of one year. If your spacecraft is more massive, then it will lose velocity more slowly (as it has greater momentum).

I agree with the other comments, however, that your approach seems to be somewhat flawed, as you'll need to impart a delta-v to the debris lest it simply continue to follow the same orbit you're in. (It will eventually deorbit on its own, sure, but very slowly.)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.