What is the maximum practical deltaV obtainable from a chemical rocket launched from earths surface?

Not an exact number as there are too many variables but an approximate maximum assuming a 10,000kg, payload, with propellants, engines and structures in use today, as many stages as required and total lift of mass not to exceed 6000,000kg

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Suggest editing to constrain by either pad size or weight. Both of those get solvable math problems where this gets complicated picking a 'maximum' what-if.xkcd.com/24 $\endgroup$ Jun 8, 2020 at 9:46
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks - I have updated it $\endgroup$
    – Slarty
    Jun 8, 2020 at 11:18

2 Answers 2


About 19 km/s with two stages.

We can compare a couple of boosters to get an idea of limits for a first stage at least. Falcon 9 block 5 has $I_{sp}$ at sea level of 280 seconds and a mass ratio of 20. Superheavy, as envisaged, has an $I_{sp}$ at sea level of 330 seconds and a mass ratio of 14. We'll be optimistic and take the higher number for both (probably a bit too optimistic, liquid methane tankage masses more than RP-1 tankage).

Once we're out of the atmosphere, we can get higher $I_{sp}$ and possibly higher mass ratio a we don't need much thrust. Something like a space shuttle external tank with a fairly small but efficient engine will give you a mass ratio of maybe 25 and an $I_{sp}$ in vacuum of about 450s. It's dry mass is only about 30 tons.

So let's stick to a two stage model and see what numbers we get. We'll take $M$ as the wet mass of the upper stage.

So the wet mass of the first stage is $5990 - M$ tons and its dry mass is therefore $$\frac{5990 -M}{20}$$ so the total mass at first stage burnout is $$10 + M + \frac{5990 -M}{20}$$ and the actual mass ratio for the first stage burn is $$\frac{6000}{10 + M + \frac{5990 -M}{20}}$$ which we can simplify to $$\frac{120000}{6190 + 19M}$$ giving a delta-V of $$330 \ g_0 \log \left(\frac{120000}{6190 + 19M}\right)$$

where the exhaust velocity $v_e$ for the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation is the product of $I_{sp}$ in seconds times standard gravity $g_0$, and $log$ is the natural logarithm.

Now the second stage has a dry mass of $M/25$ for a total mass at second stage burnout of $10 + M/25$ and a mass ratio of $$\frac{M + 10}{M/25 + 10}$$ which simplifies to $$\frac{25M + 250}{M + 250}$$ and gives us a delta-V of $$450 \ g_0 \log\left(\frac{25M + 250}{M + 250}\right)$$ so now we just need to choose $M$ to maximise the sum of these two numbers:

$$330 \ g_0 \log \left(\frac{120000}{6190 + 19M}\right) + 450 \ g_0 \log\left(\frac{25M + 250}{M + 250}\right)$$

Differentiating and solving numerically, we get an optimum $M$ of about 360 tons (roughly half a shuttle external tank) for a delta-V of about 19 km/s (before air resistance and gravity drag).

Going with another stage might help a bit, as we are still carrying over 10 tons of dry second stage at the end of the acceleration. A similar, but more complicated calculation should handle that case.


About 21.3 km/s with 5 stages. To develop this model, I used Kerbal Space Program with Real Solar System & Realism Overhaul.

The rocket as built, by stage (dimensions given in diameter x length)

  1. 12 x 54 m stir-welded Al-Li semi-stringer construction tanks. 44 sea-level Raptors (330 s sl. Isp, 355 s vac. Isp). Total dry mass of stage: 257 tons. Total wet mass of stage: 4874 tons. Mass ratio: 18.9. Off-Pad SLT: 1.24. Burn time: 3.5 minutes. dV contribution: between 4.7-5.1 km/s.

  2. 12 x 15 m Al-Li integral construction tanks. 7x J-2X engines (448 s vac. Isp). Total dry mass of stage: 80 tons. Total wet mass of stage: 691 tons. Mass ratio: 8.6. Burn time: 5 minutes. dV contribution: 3.4 km/s.

  3. 8 x 15 m Al-Li integral construction tanks. 2x J-2X engines. Total dry mass of stage: 33 tons. Total wet mass of stage: 302 tons. Mass ratio: 9.2. Burn time: 7.5 minutes (1 minute burn required for orbital insertion). dV contribution: 4 km/s.

  4. 6 x 6 m Steel-Al-Li pressure-stabilized balloon tanks. 4x RL-10B-2 engines (465 s vac. Isp). Total dry mass of stage: 5.7 tons. Total wet mass of stage: 80.6 tons. Mass ratio: 14.1. Burn time: 13 minutes.

  5. 3 x 3 m Steel-Al-Li pressure-stabilized balloon tanks. 2x AJ10- Transtar engines (vac. Isp). Total dry mass of stage: 1 ton. Total wet mass of stage: 38 tons. Mass ratio: 38. Burn time: 38 minutes. dV contribution: 4.8 km/s.

Payload was slightly over 10 tons (10,010 kg), containing avionics, batteries, and lead ballast to make up the difference. All dry mass values for stages contain the estimated masses of decouplers, engines, turbopumps, fairings, etc. Payload fairings (which enclose the two balloon tank stages) decouple shortly after the second stage ignites. Hydrolox stages are either a Centaur-derived stage or use SOFI.

As you can see, mass ratios are rather south of pessimistic (likely because I used a generally more-than-optimal number engines per stage), except for the Transtar-derived upper stage. However, Transtar was in development to have an extremely low mass ratio (see reference), and I think with modern (Steel-Al-Li) balloon tankage, such a ratio is possible. The long burn time is also reasonable--the Transtar engine was derived from the Shuttle OMS, which had a EXTREMELY high rated burn time.

Burn time of the J-2X stages was kept to below the 500 s J-2 burn time. The RL-10B-2 stage was kept to below the 700 s burn time of the DCUS stage.

Together, this gives me about 21.3 km/s, 21.6 km/s if only vacuum dV numbers are summed. Again, note that my mass ratios are generally much lower than the that of the other answers'. If the middle stages also had ~20:1 ratios, then it is likely that you would achieve in excess of 23 km/s on the pad. Also, of course if you replaced some of those 10 tons of payload with some high-performance light solid stage, you would be able to get even more dV out of your setup. Tsiolkovsky is an inescapable god, and he loves more stages.

Additionally, I demonstrated that such a rocket could be flown to 200 km orbit successfully. Details may be found in this imgur album.

Such a rocket would look something like this upon liftoff:

enter image description here

And something like this after staging and fairing separation (forgive the unrealistic hydrolox vacuum plume, the RO dev team fixed this but I am still playing on an older test build):

enter image description here

If this KSP-RSSRO-sourced answer is not satisifactory for this SE, I will remove it.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.