5
$\begingroup$

Which is a more stable lander design:

1.Single central engine.

2.Multiple engines located near the corners

Following is the design for Tianwen-1, the Chinese Mars lander:

enter image description here

And following is the design for InSight, the NASA Mars lander:

enter image description here

At the first glance it seems that a single engine design may be a little more unstable than the multi engine counterpart. I am confused about what is taken in to account for the placement of thrusters/engines...

What are the various parameters taken into consideration while designing the engine configuration/number for a lander (moon / Mars, taking atmosphere into account)?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Great question, not long ago I asked a question about Viking, which had 3 engines. $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble Jul 17 at 20:23
  • 1
  • $\begingroup$ This is pure speculation, so I will not post as an answer: One engine is probably simpler, but with three, you can adjust the throttle on each to help steer. $\endgroup$ – BarrowWight Jul 18 at 21:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There's several tradeoffs, it's more than just a matter of stability. With multiple separated engines, you need fast, precise throttling to keep things under control. This arrangement will be more suited for a squat and wide lander, with each engine pointing well away from the center of mass. With a single central engine (or a compact cluster for redundancy), you can't use differential thrust and need gimbaling instead. This arrangement is better suited for a tall lander with high center of gravity, but might still be used for a squat one due to not needing as precise throttle control. $\endgroup$ – Christopher James Huff Jul 19 at 1:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.