MOXIE or The Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment is to be sent to Mars as a part of Perseverance's scientific payload.

Sure the experiment is much needed and very anticipated, and Perseverance is a robust, good platform, but I just don't see any benefit from MOXIE being made mobile. Wouldn't it be more reasonable to send it on InSight, or some other lander mission instead of hauling it all around Mars, on a rover that is already heavy as heck and needs to waste energy carrying the extra load? Or does the experiment benefit somehow from being installed on a mobile platform vs stationary?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The experiment has the secondary goal of "characterization of atmospheric dust size and morphology to understand its effects on the operation of surface systems.". I suppose being mobile means they can take measurements from more diverse atmospheric conditions, but I haven't found enough data for an answer yet. $\endgroup$ – Polygnome Jul 27 '20 at 11:39
  • $\begingroup$ This is a great question! "...a rover that is already heavy as heck and needs to waste energy carrying the extra load?" reminds me of the premise of Balancing Perseverance Mars Rover; couldn't they just “move stuff around a little” rather than add 6+ kg of dead weight? $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jul 27 '20 at 13:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh Maybe they found out they need 12+kg of dead weight and found MOXIE just fits the profile of half of that? $\endgroup$ – SF. Jul 27 '20 at 13:32
  • $\begingroup$ because sometimes when you want to get somewhere, you jump on the available bus headed that direction? ;) $\endgroup$ – NKCampbell Apr 22 at 14:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.