5
$\begingroup$

One proposed design for a Dyson sphere is the Dyson bubble, which consists of statites (satellites that use light pressure to counteract gravity). In this design, the statites remain stationary relative to the star, but they need to be very lightweight, with an average areal density of 0.78 g/m2 (about 1/100 the density of paper).

However, would a "hybrid" design work, one that uses a combination of light pressure and orbital velocity to counteract gravity? This seems to be possible according to the Wikipedia page for statites. With this idea, the statites wouldn't have to be as lightweight as "pure" statites. Also, if my understanding is correct, this would still allow people living on the statites to experience gravity, something not possible with a regular satellite (unless it's rotating, which introduces its own issues). Of course, this means the statites would now have to move relative to the star, which removes some of the Dyson bubble's advantages.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Query: Should the units of density be g/m2, as currently stated in the question, or the usual g/m3? $\endgroup$
    – Fred
    Jul 30, 2020 at 4:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The units are in m2 because it's the density of an essentially 2D structure: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_density $\endgroup$
    – Pitto
    Jul 30, 2020 at 4:59

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.