13
$\begingroup$

It is rumored that NASA uses the movie Armageddon in management training, to count the number of impossibilities. Specifically, they claim there are 168 scientific impossibilities in the movie. Two questions:

  1. Does NASA really use this in their training?
  2. Does this list of 168 impossibilities really exist?
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is hard to put an exact number on scientific accuracies in a movie because there are so many different ways to count them. For example, the Mir sequence in Armageddon could be aggregated into a single bullet-point "This is not the Mir station" or you could create a list of every single part of the Mir station which isn't there. The further you go into detail, the more points you have. $\endgroup$ – Philipp Jun 4 '14 at 13:07
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think they actually called it Mir, or perhaps I'm just wrong there... Besides, I'll give them artistic license for that one... $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto Jun 4 '14 at 13:23
13
$\begingroup$

Try an exact phrase web search for "NASA shows the film as part of its management training program. Prospective managers are asked to find as many inaccuracies in the movie as they can." You'll get lots of hits. Lots and lots of them. That smacks of hand-me-down news, which makes the story ring a bit false. Where a source is attributed it's the Feedback section of the September 1, 2007 edition of New Scientist:

Armageddon games

WHY does NASA show the movie Armageddon as part of its management training programmes? ... In reality, the screenings are just a game for NASA's space geeks: who can find the highest number of impossible things in the movie? The record, Feedback is told, stands at 168.

The ellipsis is a few fluff sentences I edited out to keep my quote within the realm of fair use. I didn't cut that much. Note that there's no attribution, no context. It's a fluff piece. Who knows whether it's true?

That said, I can think of one context where this might well have happened. NASA does send their management trainees to fairly extensive and sometimes intensive classes. Occasionally they need to do something fun to lower the intensity. Some companies hold a paintball session to accomplish that end. The "fun" session at a NASA retreat is reportedly a bit more nerdish. Tearing a "so bad it's good" sci-fi movie to shreds would fit right in.

The New Scientist article was printed 6½ years ago. If the article was true, there's no knowing if it was something NASA still did in 2007. It might have been something NASA did years before that, but the news came to New Scientist by word of mouth. I highly doubt it that this is used now because (a) the movie is now old and (b) management everywhere regularly changes how they do training. Now they might rip Gravity to shreds.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Ripping Gravity to shreds is a little more interesting than the same for Armageddon, it seems to try just a little bit more. $\endgroup$ – gerrit Jun 4 '14 at 14:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.