21
$\begingroup$

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) project could be fantastic, It has the promise of seeing farther than Hubble, almost to the beginning of our space/time.

But, orbiting at L2 - while closer by far than other LaGrange points - is still 1.5m KM away from Earth. That is four times more distant than humans have ever travelled.

My question is this: This project has had a difficult construction history. (Most do but this has been more challenging). Are there ideas or plans for rescue/repair/restore missions if/when something goes wrong?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
5
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ You are swearing in church! JWST, the major space telescope project of our quarter of a century will succeed and will be a triumph. If there's an issue then entrepreneurial and astronautic supermen will emerge and somehow simply improvise a fix. Docking Dragon with Bigalow and something else and just go there and make things good. When everything is at stake on one single mission, nerves and politics are at play and the tendency is to postpone the potential fiasco to keep the dream alive. But honestly, the failure ratio is getting very low even for more challenging missions like Mars landings. $\endgroup$
    – LocalFluff
    Jun 30, 2014 at 14:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I like your attitude! $\endgroup$
    – ICL1901
    Jun 30, 2014 at 15:06
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Not worthy of an answer, but note that the JWST will "break" about ten years after launch. That's when it runs out of fuel. $\endgroup$
    – David Hammen
    Jun 30, 2014 at 21:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is imho, worthy of an answer.. But anyway, can the fuel cells be replaced? It's taken a long time to build the JWST, and wouldn't we have to start on its replacement now to be ready in 10 years? $\endgroup$
    – ICL1901
    Jul 3, 2014 at 11:54
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting question! This is slightly related: aviationweek.com/new-space/… $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Nov 9, 2016 at 10:03

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
17
$\begingroup$

There is a docking ring on the JWST, so in theory astronauts could visit it. It would be easier to get to JWST than to the Moon, but more difficult than LEO like we have been doing. Edward Weiler, director of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, had this to say on the subject:

We cannot make the James Webb Space Telescope fully serviceable like the Hubble because that would cost so much money that I don't think this country could afford it. However, what if you have a bad day when you put this thing a million miles out and everything folds out except for an antenna ... it gets stuck? Or a solar panel doesn't fold out completely, and you say, 'gee, I wish we could send an astronaut just to give it a kick'?

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Your source is 7 years old. Is the docking capability still in the mission? $\endgroup$
    – LocalFluff
    Jun 30, 2014 at 14:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I can't find anything to suggest that it's not. Still, there doesn't seem to be much about this in the last several years... $\endgroup$
    – PearsonArtPhoto ♦
    Jun 30, 2014 at 14:45
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "that would cost so much money that I don't think this country could afford it" I find that hard to believe. We spent just under $1 billion a day in Iraq for years; we could no doubt "afford" to do whatever we wanted with JWST. The question is not whether we can afford to, but whether we want to. $\endgroup$
    – TylerH
    Feb 1, 2018 at 20:17
  • $\begingroup$ James Webb Space Telescope Program Scientist Dr. Eric Smith spoke about this on TMRO recently and mentioned that there were optical targets near the fuel ports that could potentially be used for refueling. $\endgroup$
    – Head Pancakes
    Apr 15, 2019 at 3:41
  • $\begingroup$ @HeadPancakes optical targets potentially used for docking perhaps? $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Dec 29, 2021 at 3:01
12
$\begingroup$

As of 2013, NASA still had a docking ring for the JWST. ① While they have no plans to service JWST, they left the docking capability just in case.

The most likely service vehicles are either an Orion capsule (4 man) or Dragon 2 Capsule (7 man); a Dragon 2 atop a Falcon Heavy could easily reach and have delta-V sufficient for return. ②

References

① Space.com JWST Infographic (http://www.space.com/21232-nasa-james-webb-space-telescope-infographic.html)

② SpaceX Dragon 2 (http://www.spacex.com/news/2014/05/30/dragon-v2-spacexs-next-generation-manned-spacecraft)

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Great. Thanks.. +1 Any idea when those vehicles will come online? (and how did you make your 1 and 2 circles/numbers :) $\endgroup$
    – ICL1901
    Jul 3, 2014 at 11:52
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a published mass breakdown for the Dragon 2? $\endgroup$
    – MercuryPlus
    Jul 3, 2014 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ The circled numbers are standard unicode (U+2460 to U+2469), @DavidDelMonte. $\endgroup$
    – aramis
    Jul 3, 2014 at 17:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MercuryPlus a total mass has been mentioned in videos by Elon Musk. He's mentioned previously that the design is intended as a shuttle capability replacement. $\endgroup$
    – aramis
    Jul 3, 2014 at 17:38
10
$\begingroup$

None whatsoever. If JWST has issues, it is basically out of luck.

Maybe one day, Orion might be able to go visit, but Orion is a lousy repair platform compared to the Shuttle.

Shuttle had more crew (7 vs 4), more room for equipment, a place to dock the Hubble as a work platform, an RMS to move heavy equipment around (in and out of the Hubble).

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer, although I was hoping for something more optimistic.. This is what I feared.. Well. I hope all the low bidders got their pieces right. $\endgroup$
    – ICL1901
    Jun 30, 2014 at 11:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I like the idea that private industry would mount an effort to fix and takeover the spacecraft/telescope.. $\endgroup$
    – ICL1901
    Jun 30, 2014 at 15:20
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @David DelMonte "Takeover", yeah, I can see how Elon Musk's South African grandfather Auric Goldfinger and his cat will defrost back to life and space pirate the JWST in a Dragon capsule to hold the world astronomical society ransom for... a million dollar! $\endgroup$
    – LocalFluff
    Jun 30, 2014 at 16:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You know I meant takeover in the sense of engineering project management, and not in the sense of ship piracy... $\endgroup$
    – ICL1901
    Jun 30, 2014 at 16:10
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @MercuryPlus What Lunar Base operation? I wish I could tell you otherwise, but we don't have any. $\endgroup$
    – TildalWave
    Jul 1, 2014 at 14:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.