3
$\begingroup$

Yesterday's Starship landing saw at least one Raptor burning copper. Given that copper oxidizes with oxygen at the temperatures and pressures found in a Raptor combustion chamber, what properties does it impart on the combustion?

What would be the exhaust velocity of a hypothetical tri-propellant methane-copper-oxygen engine? Would that translate to specific impulse in the same fashion as conventional (OK, methane isn't yet conventional) rocket fuels do? I'm assuming a molecular weight higher that hydrogen so less Isp of course, but how would it compare to e.g. RP-1? Would gaseous copper (gaseous in the chamber after oxidizing, but no reason that the stored fuel could not be solid) have a higher or lower molecular weight than hydrocarbons such as RP-1?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Copper's kind of hard to pump. $\endgroup$ Dec 10 '20 at 18:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @OrganicMarble: Not necessarily. Just as control rods are inserted into fission reactors, so could copper rods be inserted into a combustion chamber. $\endgroup$
    – dotancohen
    Dec 10 '20 at 19:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.