5
$\begingroup$

A launch service request was recently put out for Europa Clipper to do a flyby of Mars on its way to Jupiter. How is that a better trajectory than an EEJ, similar to Juno?

Launch Vehicle Performance: The launch vehicle shall deliver a minimum 6065 kg Europa Clipper spacecraft (SC) with Mars-Earth-Gravity-Assist (MEGA) trajectory characteristics as follows: C3 value of 41.69km2/sec2 and a DLA range of 30-32 degrees.

Launch Period: Europa Clipper will be launched during a 21-day launch period beginning October 10, 2024 and ending on October 30, 2024.

enter image description here

It seems like the presentation was in a Europa Clipper presentation. The trajectory seems to be as follows.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think the answer is that the Mars flyby replaces a deep space maneuver that would otherwise be required, but I haven't found a great proof for this. $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto Jan 27 at 22:08
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The image for your simulation contains what I think is important text; Earth departure C3 = 25.5 km²/s². Am I reading it right, and is an important aspect of your question why they are requesting a higher C3 launch than seems necessary? $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 27 at 22:12
5
$\begingroup$

It seems like the biggest difference is the ability to avoid a 700 m/s deep space maneuver. That is required for a Juno style trajectory. The Mars flyby provides enough delta-v that this deep space maneuver isn't required.

In order to support the EEJ trajectory, a small booster stage would be needed to be included to provide that particular trajectory, as Europa Clipper was designed for a direct to Jupiter mission on SLS. The other option would be a Venus flyby, but that would have required some kind of a heat shield.

The information to support this all is in the question, but it took a bit to understand it.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Warning: this is a speculative answer.

I sadly would not be surprised if it were a political move to "prove" to Congress the "need" of SLS instead of relying on other launchers. Unless the Sun is in between the spacecraft and the Earth, a TCM on the way to Mars is not a big issue.

According to KSC (thanks Brendan Luke), a Falcon Heavy can launch almost 6.3 tons tons with $c_3=42 ~km^2/s^2$.

FH

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As a post scriptum, let's note that the new policy for the Biden Admin is led by legacy aerospace corporations who seem to ignore the existence of the Falcon Heavy and Starship: twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1354888136376070147?s=20 . $\endgroup$ – ChrisR Jan 28 at 21:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ elvperf.ksc.nasa.gov/Pages/Query.aspx is your friend here, It also suggests ~12.5 tons at a C3 of 10 km^2/s^2 $\endgroup$ – BrendanLuke15 Apr 19 at 17:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BrendanLuke15 oh this is cool, thanks! I'll fix my answer with that data $\endgroup$ – ChrisR Apr 19 at 17:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.