The SpaceX Starship will have engines that light up in space and propel the ship to Mars. Companies and organizations use vacuum engines in space.

However, Starship has to land on Mars, travel back through space, and then land on earth.

What type of engine are they going to use to land?

  • Sea level or Vacuum?

  • Or a specialized engine?


As of September 2020, the plan was for Starship to install three sea-level Raptors and three vacuum Raptors.

The vacuum engines will likely be used by themselves for the trans-Martian burn from Earth orbit, and the return burn from Mars to Earth, as efficiency matters much more than total thrust for those maneuvers.

Mars's atmosphere is thin enough that vacuum-optimized Raptors would work very well all the way down to the surface, but I would guess for the final touchdown they'll use the sea-level optimized Raptors. That way, only one set of engines will need powerful gimbals with a broad angle range; the vacuum Raptors could get away with lighter-weight gimbal hardware (or even none at all, using differential throttle for steering trim). For the brief landing burn, the loss of efficiency in using sea-level engines should be acceptable.

I don't know if they will use all six engines for Mars liftoff (but my guess is that they will, at least for the early part of ascent); it's a tradeoff between reaching orbit faster to minimize gravity losses, versus getting the most thrust per kilogram of propellant.

The three sea-level engines will be used for Earth landing, as the recent series of test flights have done.

  • $\begingroup$ I read somewhere that broad gimbals were for vacuum :-/ $\endgroup$ – Anixx Apr 10 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ For instance: nasaspaceflight.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/… $\endgroup$ – Anixx Apr 10 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ Are you talking about the nozzles? $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Apr 10 at 23:11
  • $\begingroup$ But wont that add extra weight? $\endgroup$ – C0D3X Apr 11 at 9:19
  • $\begingroup$ The RVacs are not TVC-capable, they don't have gimbal mounts etc. It probably wouldn't make much sense anyway, there is not much room for the huge nozzles to gimbal without colliding with the skirt or the unpressurized cargo racks (assuming those are still a thing … you never know with SpaceX). $\endgroup$ – Jörg W Mittag Apr 11 at 21:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.