17
$\begingroup$

Although I have seen many perfectly symmetric nozzles, I have also seen designs such as this (Virgin Galactic) which is only symmetrical about one axis:

Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo

Why is this?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry I mean the Falcon yes. $\endgroup$ – Jonny Sep 16 '14 at 15:39
14
$\begingroup$

According to comments on this thread, the shape of the nozzle on SpaceShip Two is to provide "free pitch-up" during the short powered flight period. That nozzle shape would direct thrust force downward slightly, under the craft's center of gravity, causing it to slowly rotate nose-upward. Presumably modifying the nozzle shape was easier than tilting the whole engine, and the nozzle can be customized for different flight profiles (i.e. more or less fuel carried on a particular flight).

In this video, you can see the pitch-up maneuver during the powered burn from roughly 0:30 to 1:00. Ordinary aircraft achieve pitch-up by using control surfaces (elevators/elevons), but using these creates drag. Directing the rocket motor thrust instead gives a pitching force, with less drag.

$\endgroup$
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Just a note that the Falcon 9 v1.0 used 3x3 engine layout on the photo and that isn't the configuration they're flying now on Falcon 9 v1.1 that is using a petal layout with 1 central engine and remaining 8 in a circle around it. Nozzles still seem axially symmetric to me tho, so this doesn't change anything for the answer. $\endgroup$ – TildalWave Sep 18 '14 at 11:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.