In lieu of authoritative data there is always homebrew simulation.
The necessary details about Crew Dragon & its entry, short of aerodynamics, are relatively easy to find:
Critical aerodynamic parameters are the drag coefficient, $C_d$, and the lift to drag ratio, $L/D$. While in general a function of Mach number, these values are (pretty much) invariant in the hypersonic regime (Mach >= 5) and are therefore treated as constant in this simulation.
I was able to infer a drag coefficient from the abstract of A. A. Gonzales et al., "Mars Sample Return using commercial capabilities: Mission architecture overview" and its associated presentation focusing on EDL.
From abstract:
Total entry masses between 7 and 10 mt were considered
Plot from presentation:

Where $\beta$ is the ballistic coefficient $\beta=\frac{m}{C_D S}$:
Area, S ($m^2$) |
Mass (kg) |
$\beta$ ($kg/m^2$) |
$C_D$ |
12.6 |
7,000 |
450 |
1.24 |
12.6 |
10,000 |
650 |
1.22 |
Thus $C_D=1.23$ (and $\beta=622$ $kg/m^2$).
The $L/D$ is dependent on the axial displacement of the center of mass of the vehicle (which determines the trim angle of attack) and is configurable prior to entry/flight (I believe Apollo experimented with this in test flights; see $L/D$ differences in flight data from AS-202 & Apollo 4).
The value used in the plot, 0.27, is definitely plausible; however, it is higher than other low-Earth orbit crewed entry capsules (Soyuz: 0.26, Dragon 1: 0.18, Gemini: ~0.15, Mercury: 0, ballistic). I used $L/D$ as a fudge factor to make the maximum inertial loading (g-force) about 4.2 g's as described by Demo-2 astronaut Bob Behnken. Here is a plot of the (significant) variation of some entry stats based on differing $L/D$ values, with 0.13 being the selected value:

With all of that out of the way, here is a selection of figures from the simulation (please comment what others you wish to see):
Entry Setup:

Note I have defined entry interface at 120 km (extremes of my atmospheric model), in reality this is sometimes a dynamically sensed condition (g-detect) so the duration may seem a little long (click to enlarge):


References:
- A. A. Gonzales et al., "Mars Sample Return using commercial capabilities: Mission architecture overview," 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2014, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1109/AERO.2014.6836421.
- L. G. Lemke et al."Mars Sample Return Using Commercial Capabilities: Propulsive Entry, Descent and Landing," 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2014 (retrieved from NTRS id: 20140013203)
- Xu Guowu et al., Effect of Recession on the Re-entry Capsule Aerodynamic Characteristic, Procedia Engineering, Volume 99, 2015, Pages 377-383, ISSN 1877-7058, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.550.
- Trevino , L. "SpaceX Dragon Re-Entry Vehicle: Aerodynamics and Aerothermodynamics with Application to Base Heat-Shield Design," 6th International Planetary Probe Workshop Conference Proceedings, 2008 (Georgia Tech link)
- Whitnah, A. M. & Howes, D. B. "Summary analysis of the Gemini entry aerodynamics," 1972 (retrieved from NTRS id: 19730014059)
- Brown, S. W. & Moseley, W. C., Jr. "Summary of wind-tunnel investigations of the static longitudinal stability characteristics of the production Mercury configurations at Mach numbers from 0.05 to 20," 1961 (retrieved from NTRS id: 19710069960)