So I went to the link in a recent question and discovered SpaceX turns its first stage around while it is going, what, several km/s in the upper atmosphere, restarts 3 of the engines and fires retrograde to slow the stage down and get it heading back towards the launchpad. Aside from suddenly realizing I had absolutely failed to appreciate the distances involved in this maneuver, I had a real 'Wait, what?' moment when thinking about turning around a mostly hollow tube at those speeds in even a thin atmosphere, aiming it precisely retrograde, and keeping it aimed that way as it slows down without losing control.

That sounds stupendously difficult. Is it? How do they manage it? (The link is to a good article in Aviation Week about the data NASA collected from the September CRS-4 launch during the retrograde burn, which the hope to use for design of propulsive deceleration on Mars.)

  • $\begingroup$ I really thought that part of the challenge would be your exhaust gases heating up the air you're about to fly through... but perhaps that's insignificant compared to compression heating, and there seem to be enough challenges besides that. $\endgroup$
    – craq
    Feb 14, 2019 at 0:43

1 Answer 1

  1. Having the business end of the rocket survive the dynamic pressure and heating of facing into the flow, where in general that part of the rocket is not designed to be aerodynamic. This is a challenge whether or not the engines are firing. Having the engines running can actually help a little here, rejecting flow into those nozzles, but they are not running all of the engines.

  2. Starting an engine with a supersonic flow impinging on the nozzle. This may or may not be a challenge, but you don't really know until you try. It is, to put it gently, problematic to simulate or test on the ground.

  3. Pointing the stick into the wind before you enter is not too difficult, but keeping it pointed into the wind is critical. Just a little bit off and the side forces on the fuselage can overwhelm the control authority of the gimbaled nozzles, flip the vehicle, and subject it to side forces that can break up the vehicle. You try to make the launch vehicle structure as light as possible, so it isn't designed to take full-on dynamic pressure loads from the side.

  4. Once in the supersonic flow, the aerodynamic effects of the messy business end of the rocket can be complicated, making control a bit of a challenge. You can have counterintuitive effects that redirect flow in unexpected directions at different angles of attack.

  5. Predicting the effect of the running engines on the drag is a challenge. The thrust plumes tend to reduce the drag, countering in part the intent of firing the engines to increase deceleration. With enough of a thrust to drag ratio, this is not a show stopper, but you need to be able to predict how large the effect is to know if you have enough fuel. This impact on drag also complicates what happens when you gimbal the engine, which is part of the challenge in #4. Again, high thrust to drag ratio can reduce the surprises here.

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Wow, now the achievement of SpaceX looks absolutely brilliant. $\endgroup$ Oct 26, 2014 at 5:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @iamcreasy Thanks for the link. Watching that happen is pretty cool. Getting sufficient data from a launch to tweak this design looks like a huge challenge in itself. Even running an accurate virtual simulation strikes me as difficult. $\endgroup$
    – kim holder
    Oct 26, 2014 at 20:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No. It's a 180 on the airframe. $\endgroup$
    – Mark Adler
    Oct 27, 2014 at 15:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ At Mars you don't fire the engines at entry. You let the atmosphere slow the vehicle down as much as possible, and wait until you're pretty close to the ground, and going much slower than at entry, to turn on the engines. $\endgroup$
    – Mark Adler
    Apr 28, 2016 at 15:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Starting an engine with a supersonic flow coming up the nozzle" - the supersonic flow isn't "coming up" the nozzle, as the chamber is otherwise sealed, meaning there is no exit. Instead, it will form a standing shock at the base of the engine bell, which the flow will spill around. $\endgroup$
    – Skyler
    Feb 21, 2018 at 14:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.