I've been trying to implement a higher order Runge-Kutta numerical integrator in MATLAB for a bit now with ambitions of n-body trajectory fun. Unfortunately, I have not had success in reaping the rewards of such higher order methods.
Various answers on the site have suggested RK78 and RK89. I found Fehlberg's Technical Report (NTRS ID: 19680027281) describing both, as well as C++ source code from Trick and GMAT giving the Butcher tableaus (in a C++ structure) for each method. This gives me confidence that my coefficients are correct as I copied them into my MATLAB script (and only "translated" to MATLAB).
My simple test case is an object in a 2D 185 km orbit above "Earth", that is, a point mass with no atmosphere. I used a fixed 30 second time step (just trying to get one of the orders to work!).
For both of my RK78 & RK89 implementations I get nearly identical erroneous outputs of this growing spiral-like trajectory:
Edit: my specific energy plots were not correct, I have fixed those, the problem(s) still remain with the trajectory.
These results occur regardless of whether I select the 7th or 8th (or 8th or 9th) order output.
Compare these to a much more reasonable result from a Dormand Price integration programmed in the same structure (trajectory plot excluded because it's expectedly benign):
Here is a code snippet of the core iteration scheme:
% k is a m x 4 matrix where m is the number of stages, 16 for RK89 (shown), 13 for RK78. % multiplying the weights (C, m x 1, transposed) by k (m x 4) gives the output 'slopes' (1 x 4) while 1 % Runge-Kutta Slopes for j = 1:16 % k_j (individual k slopes) input = zi(i,:); for jj = 1:16 % (component of k slopes, B matrix) input = input + B(j,jj)*k(jj,:); end k(j,:) = dz(input,G,M_E)'; % call physics model for j'th node end % Forward local extrapolation i = i+1; % move time forward % Break Conditions ... % Integrate zi(i,:) = zi(i-1,:) + dt*(C'*k); % next state end % force model function 'dz': function dzdt = dz(z,G,M_E) aG_E = G*M_E/(z(1)^2 + z(2)^2); % gravitational acceleration (m/s^2) % State Variable Definitions: % z1 = x, z2 = y, % z3 = Vx, z4 = Vy % 'slopes': dzdt(1) = z(3); dzdt(2) = z(4); dzdt(3) = -aG_E*z(1)/sqrt(z(1)^2 + z(2)^2); dzdt(4) = -aG_E*z(2)/sqrt(z(1)^2 + z(2)^2); end
Does anyone have any clues as to what is going (so horribly) wrong?