When Hubble was built, there was a defect in the mirror that caused the images to be blurry. Astronauts then went to install extra optics on the telescope to fix the blurriness. What did these extra optics look like? Are there any pictures of them before and after they got installed onto Hubble?


1 Answer 1


The original "fix" was an package called COSTAR (Corrective Optics Space Telescope Axial Replacement). Externally it just looked like a big silver box.

enter image description here

(Image credit - NASA)

In order to install it, one of the 4 original axial instrument boxes - containing the High Speed Photometer - had to be removed so that COSTAR could take its place.

During the same servicing mission (STS-61) another instrument, the Wide Field and Planetary Camera (WFPC) was replaced with WFPC 2 which had corrections built in. COSTAR corrected the optics for the remaining axial instruments, the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph, the Faint Object Spectrograph, and the Faint Object Camera.

Future instruments that were replaced included built-in corrections, so COSTAR was eventually removed and replaced by the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph, regaining that axial slot for an instrument.

So COSTAR now resides in the National Air and Space Museum. There you can see the deployed mirrors that were inserted into the light path to correct the aberration.

enter image description here

(Image credit - NASM)

This schematic shows how the mirrors were deployed from the big silver box.

enter image description here

Here is an orientation rendering from the NASA visualization tool DOUG, showing COSTAR in an axial instrument slot and the WFPC 2 "popped out".

enter image description here


  • $\begingroup$ looking at the NASM photo, would I be correct in concluding that that's basically the "business end" of the extensible "optical bench" rather than the complete unit? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2022 at 8:24
  • $\begingroup$ @MarkMorganLloyd yes that's a closeup of just the little "arm" with the mirrors on it, with a protective cover over it for museum display. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2022 at 13:16
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, a link cited in one of the early comments partly confirmed that, but I thought it a fair question "for the record". An interesting (albeit geeky) story would be the detail of the instrumentation that they made to ensure that the correctors worked properly: I presume that somebody got the job of making up a similarly-flawed primary even if of a reduced diameter. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2022 at 21:09
  • $\begingroup$ I presume that in the "installation" photo there are tethers that prevent the COSTAR unit floating off into space should the astronaut's attention wander :-) Noting that the "box" is mostly empty with internal bracing etc., that must have been one of the most valuable payloads per-kilo ever. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2022 at 21:16
  • $\begingroup$ There's interesting material from @Hobbes at astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/27912/… (cited earlier) which shows how light was directed axially into the COSTAR "optical bench" and then redirected to one of the instruments. This raises the question of how the HST's secondary mirror originally directed the focussed image into the selected instrument's aperture which was of the order of 2.5": presumably it had steering servos. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2022 at 22:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.