5
$\begingroup$

This mission profile seems like a no-brainer to me, but I don't recall seeing it mentioned in Orion coverage. I know this may have more to do with politics than anything else, but I'm more interested in technical points such as:

Have ISS missions been discussed internally by the Orion design team?
What remains to be done to achieve a manned rating for Orion?
Are there any current US man-rated launch vehicles capable of sending it to the ISS?
If not, what would qualifying a suitable launcher take?

Or is there some sort of non-compete clause in the CCtCAP program?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are asking multiple questions, some of them already answered. When you have multiple questions, it is better to ask them separately. $\endgroup$ – Philipp Dec 6 '14 at 15:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Monstrous buckets of money. Obscenely large buckets of money. It would take years, burning 100 dollar bills, one a second to burn that much money, to use Orion for ISS ferry duty. $\endgroup$ – geoffc Dec 7 '14 at 0:26
  • $\begingroup$ Orion is definitely more spacecraft than you need for the ISS ferry mission, but if it were actually used in that role, it would go a long way toward amortizing its development cost. I'm not saying it's the best solution, mind you. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Dec 7 '14 at 1:11
  • $\begingroup$ @Philipp which of the subquestions have been answered? I have no problem editing to narrow the scope. $\endgroup$ – Jerard Puckett Dec 7 '14 at 1:19
4
$\begingroup$

According to wikipedia, when Orion was conceived as part of the Constellation program, the ISS ferry role was considered; I would be surprised if that role wasn't kept in mind throughout development since then. In particular, Orion uses the ISS-compatible NASA Docking System.

Some of the excitement around the Orion EFT-1 flight was that it was "the first human-rated ship to leave LEO since Apollo"; it's not clear to me whether than meant that Orion was actually, currently human-rated or if that was stretching to cover the Orion program's overall design. In any case, human-rating is mostly a matter of "we are incorporating these necessary design features", so I would guess there's not much more to be done there.

As of this article (possibly from 2008?), the Atlas and Delta launchers are very close to being human-rated, with Delta mostly needing automatic fault detection systems that could trigger an in-flight abort. Delta IV Heavy definitely has the capacity to send Orion to ISS, Atlas V probably not.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is D4-H really powerful enough to launch Orion, with a Service module? I do not think Orion by itself has sufficient impulse and control to dock to the ISS. If you need the SM, D4H is not powerful enough. $\endgroup$ – geoffc Dec 7 '14 at 0:28
  • $\begingroup$ Looking at Wikipedia, I think it just barely adds up; 28t to 200km LEO on D4H, Orion is 21t CM+SM and takes up to 8t service module propellant -- so we can't quite bring a full tank. Only a couple hundred ms of delta-v are needed to raise from 200km to ISS at 400km, though. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Dec 7 '14 at 0:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.