Would a rocket that wanted to reach an elliptical orbit with a perigee of 100 miles (160 km) and an apogee of 300 miles (480 km) burn the same amount of fuel as a rocket that wanted to attain a circular orbit at 200 miles (320 km) altitude?

  • $\begingroup$ You may find this helpful: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_orbital_energy $\endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jul 22, 2023 at 21:15
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Pretty sure the answer is "no." Burning the fuel from x mass to y mass is directly tied to delta-V, and delta-V is tied to changes in spacecraft velocity and momentum, rather than orbital energy. Burning to a very elliptical orbit with your same periapsis is going to take less delta-v than a bi-elliptic transfer to a high circular orbit with the same semi-major axis. $\endgroup$
    – notovny
    Jul 23, 2023 at 0:00
  • $\begingroup$ @notovny I ain't talking about the same periapsis, but about the same mean value which is 200 mi in a 100 mi x 300 mi orbit. Would it take less delta-v to reach a 100x300 orbit than reaching a 200 mi circular orbit? $\endgroup$
    – Johannes
    Jul 23, 2023 at 5:28

1 Answer 1


There is no reason to expect the required fuel to be the same.

To show this, we'll produce a simple counterexample with numbers chosen for ease of calculation. We will assume that by "same mean altitude" , OP assumes a perfectly spherical planet, and that "same mean altitude" translates directly to same semi-major axis.

We'll also use generic Distance Units ($\text{D}$) and Time units ($\text{T}$); the equations would work with any consistent unit system. In the image, assume all orbits to be going counterclockwise.

enter image description here

The central body has Standard Gravitational Parameter $\mu = 1.00\,\text{D}^3/\text{T}^2$

The spacecraft in question is in the circular Parking Orbit O (black), which has a radius of $1\,\text{D}$

We are comparing the delta-V required to go from Orbit O to Orbit C, a coplanar circular orbit with radius $3.00\,\text{D}$ (semi-major axis $3.00\,\text{D}$) and from orbit O to Orbit E, a coplanar elliptical orbit with semi-major axis $3.00\,\text{D}$ but with periapsis distance $1.00\,\text{D}$ and apoapsis $5.00\,\text{D}$

Orbit O to Orbit C:

In this example the radii of the two orbits are close enough in size that the most efficient transfer from Orbit O to Orbit C is a two impulse Hohmann transfer Maneuver;

We fire the engines at the red dot, in the direction of the red arrow to put the spacecraft into a transfer orbit (red dotted orbit), then fire the engines again at the blue dot in the direction of the blue arrow to circularize into orbit C.

Impulse 1 $$\Delta v_{1}=\sqrt{\frac{μ}{r_{1}}} \left(\sqrt{\frac{2r_{2}}{r_{1} + r_{2}}} - 1\right)$$
Impulse 2 $$\Delta v_{2}=\sqrt{\frac{μ}{r_{2}}} \left(1 -\sqrt{\frac{2r_{1}}{r_{1} + r_{2}}}\right)$$

The total delta-V required for the Hohmann transfer is the sum of the above two values.

Substitute in $r_1 = 1.00 \text{D}$ and $r_2 = 3.00\,\text{D}$ and the total delta-V for the Hohmann transfer is: $$\Delta v_{C} = \Delta v_{C1} + \Delta v_{C2} = 0.22\,\text{D/T} + 0.17\, \text{D/T} = 0.39\,\text{D/T}$$

Orbit O to Orbit E:

To calculate the delta-V requirement to go from Orbit O to Orbit E... Well, in this case, Orbit E is exactly the same as a Hohmann transfer orbit that would take the spacecraft from Orbit O to a coplanar circular orbit of radius $5.00\,\text{D}$ As such we can just use the formula for Impulse 1, but substitute in $r_1 = 1.00 \text{D}$ and $r_2 = 5.00\,\text{D}$, and ignore Impulse 2 entirely.

$$\Delta v_{E} = 0.29\,\text{D/T}$$


In this counterexample case, the delta-V required to go from Orbit O to orbit C is $0.10\,\text{D/T}$ more than for going from Orbit O to Orbit E. As a result, all other things about the rocket being the same on the two different transfers, in this case, the rocket would require more fuel to go to Orbit C.

As a result we can conclude that for two different orbits of the same arbitrarily-chosen semi-major axis, there is no expectation that the fuel costs to reach both be the same.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So the reason why a circular orbit requires more delta-v is because you have to circularize it in the first place (once you reach apogee)? Isn't it possible to reach a very low (approximately-)circular orbit right away, e.g. at 100 mi (160 km) above the Earth's surface, without the need to adjust a too elliptical orbit? Your parking orbit O could be such a (near-)circular orbit that might be reached right away, couldn't it? $\endgroup$
    – Johannes
    Jul 23, 2023 at 13:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Basically...it's complicated. To demonstrate that there's no requirement that the fuel expenditure be equal, I chose an easy-to-calculate situation that showed that the fuel expenditures would be different. With the infinite number of coplanar elliptical orbits with the same semi-major axis as the circular, there are absolutely situations where getting into the chosen elliptical orbit takes more delta-V. $\endgroup$
    – notovny
    Jul 23, 2023 at 13:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I love "Basically...it's complicated"! I must now go use that phrase myself. $\endgroup$
    – Ryan C
    Jul 24, 2023 at 4:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.