14
$\begingroup$

Say I operate a satellite in LEO, and I think I have instruments on board that will be sensitive to space weather events. If I keep an eye on space weather activity levels, when do I start turning off these sensitive instruments? How often should I expect to take action like this? Finally, how dependent is all of this on my orbit altitude?

For the sake of being specific, let's say I operate CloudSat, a member of the so-called "A-Train".

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ None; you were specifically selected and trained to remain calm at all times. ;) $\endgroup$ – SF. Jul 23 '13 at 14:54
10
$\begingroup$

To boil this down to a simple answer is difficult, but here's some of the factors that are required to make this assessment.

First of all, the question comes, what is your satellite is specified to. When you build a satellite, you specify a level of radiation tolerance you desire. If you have more than that level of radiation, then you have to start taking special precautions. That level depends very much if you are in LEO, GEO, or worse, an elliptical orbit. The requirement should take care of you for your day to day operations, but probably won't take care of you for the really extreme stuff (Unless you are willing to pay for it).

So, what are some typical requirements for different orbits? One example of the typical radiation levels can be found from ESA, which has several graphs like the following:

enter image description here

Suffice to say, if you have anything much larger than the normal levels, you will start to worry about it. You can take a look at space weather today from NOAA, and see how the radiation events look. Or look at some of the archives.

In reality, this is often somewhat of a trial and error. If you notice something bad starting to happen during one solar storm, then you might look at the parameters and set limits based off of that. Or you might simply end up ultra conservative. Look through historical data, and decide how often it is acceptable to be off the air. For many communications, defence, and other uses, it's just simply not acceptable to be off the air ever, some, like special telescopes, limited outage might be preferred to the added expense of shielding.

There are also metrics which show that you aren't having a problem yet, but you might be experiencing higher levels of radiation than is healthy for your system. The best indicator is some idea as to the number of times your Error Detection and Correction algorithms are firing off. If you see a spike in them, it might indicate that you have a radiation problem that you need to deal with.

A number I've often found to be useful is looking at the proton flux, and stating if it's over 10 cm-2s-2sr-1, for LEO. I'm not very familiar with eclipse/ GEO, but I do know the satellites experience more radiation overall. Thus, they probably have more protection, and overall are better off.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "Suffice to say, if you have anything much larger than the normal levels, you will start to worry about it." -- This is exactly what I intended to ask... how much higher than normal? I phrased my question the way I did in order to make it ok for assumptions to be made -- assumptions like "I have typical amounts of shielding for my components". Thank you for making an attempt. $\endgroup$ – user29 Jul 23 '13 at 16:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Chris: It's hard to quantify a number, but after some thought, I've got a metric that can be used to know when you're getting close, the EDAC hits. See the latest revision. $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto Jul 23 '13 at 16:55
  • $\begingroup$ That is good... although presumably unless I have some autonomous handling for increased EDAC hits, it will already be "too late" to protect my spacecraft. Is there a more predictive figure of merit, perhaps? $\endgroup$ – user29 Jul 23 '13 at 17:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy