3
$\begingroup$

I assume that all space programs, manned and unmanned, have many "what if" plans for situations that might happen. For example, on the ISS they had fire alarm and evacuated to the Russian side. Are those "what if" plans publicly available? In specific, what if any of the Apollo missions that landed on the moon had had a catastrophic failure that would have prevented them from taking off from the moon?

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

Well, they prepared by writing a speech text for Nixon "In event of Moon disaster". The opportunities to "fix a problem" aren't that many in space. At least no one can hear them scream. And fewer than 20 out of 540+ have perished in space. The blackness is not as dangerous as it looks, when approached with care.

When the space shuttle Columbia failed, NASA afterwards concluded that it just might have been possible to rescue them if they had known about the problem. And that was in the era of the space shuttle when such tasks were envisioned, by the elderly, to be "routine".

Apollo was designed to enable several abort points. Apollo 13 used one of them.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Relevant xkcd. $\endgroup$ – HDE 226868 Mar 21 '15 at 13:20
  • $\begingroup$ What's the procedure when/if the moon lander can't take off the moon? Are/were there any plans to rescue them somehow? $\endgroup$ – KingsInnerSoul Mar 21 '15 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ What the procedure would be? Not much. Procedure according to manual page 42: Let them fry/freeze/whatever. But the system of abortion options during Apollo and today with the ISS, is certainly an intriguing subject. But I doubt that the actual Moon landers had any options at all. They could just pick a tiny crater nearby to be named for them ever after, and use their space suite as sarcophagus. Space travel doesn't offer second chances. $\endgroup$ – LocalFluff Mar 21 '15 at 15:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm pretty sure lunar takeoff and ascent was one of the few points during the mission when Apollo offered no meaningful possibility of backup or abort. Facts: a single craft (the LM), a single (LM ascent) engine, no alternative abort mode (like during lunar descent when the option of descent/ascent stage separation and ascent stage ignition existed for abort and return), a single shot for rendezvous with the CM in lunar orbit (not enough fuel to go around, not enough fuel to catch up with the CM, and I doubt anyone would want to risk the CM by making any significant maneuvers with it). $\endgroup$ – a CVn Mar 21 '15 at 21:16
  • $\begingroup$ There were some backups. The LM had a dedicated abort computer in addition. There were two different planned rendezvous, and if needed the CM could catch up with the LM once in space. So, yes, as far as possible there where a lot of what-ifs. $\endgroup$ – ghellquist May 9 at 18:41
5
$\begingroup$

They never built it, but the Apollo program had plans for what was essentially a chair with a rocket engine on it. It was an emergency device meant to get the astronauts from the surface into lunar orbit, where they could rendezvous with the command module. Its design philosophy favored simplicity over redundancy. So much so that it didn't even have life support, it relied on the astronaut's spacesuits to provide that.

Here's the relevant wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Escape_Systems

Can you imagine riding that thing?!?!

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Just a quick comment on getting Apollo off the lunar surface in an emergency.

Schmitt and Cernan have described an emergency procedure to "hot-wire the LM". The ascent engine was very simple by design, and if the systems that fired it failed, it could be fired simply by passing a wire down through the hatch to manually open the valve that mixed the propellants!

It would mean flying with suits pressurised, with the hatch open...

They mention it on this page: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17.eva3post.html

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

NASA is renowned for their detailed mission plans, including contingency plans for everything that could go wrong.

For the ISS, there is a publically available emergency operations manual with instructions about what to do in case of what emergency. "Fire" is page 34 - 54. However, it is not that easy to understand for a layman due to the cryptic acronyms it uses to refer to equipment and station parts (many of them in cyrillic) and the many cross-references to other operation manuals.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

HERE is an instructive video of the procedure if a fire breaks out on Soyuz.

The astronauts stay cool, at least in their minds, and use their sticks to push the right buttons. That's the plan. Reminds me of the time I was a conscript. But I think that the Russian have a tradition of being able to remotely control most of what happens on their spacecrafts from the ground.

So, first, after having closed their visors, they arrest the ventilation to stop feeding the fire with oxygen. Then they shut down the electrical supplies(!). Finally, if necessary, they decompress the spacecraft and then have to land within two hours which is how long their space suits can supply them.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.