3
$\begingroup$

I listened to the annoucement of the Vulcan NGLS booster from ULA.

The graphics released and show at SpaceFlightNow.com show a line. "350% more lift" but I could not figure out where that is coming from. enter image description here

First issue is, 350% improvement is 3.5 times more than "what"?

The CEO said they get about 30% more boost from core engine changes plus 20% from 6th booster. Where is the rest of the increase from?

The 30% engine boost would likely be 2 X BE4's vs a RD-180. 1.1 Millions lbs thrust vs 800,000 lbs thrust.

The 20% increase from 6th booster makes sense. If you had 5 and add a 6th that is about a 20% increase.

But the overall 350% compared to what? And from what improvements?

I will assume he is suggesting with the new upper stage, perhaps to BLEO or GTO/GSO orbits. But they never explain what this all really means.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Neither the infographic nor your relay of the CEO's claims say what any of these improvements are ostensibly relative to, so what are we actually talking about? $\endgroup$ Apr 13, 2015 at 22:43
  • $\begingroup$ @RussellBorogove Step 1. Relative to what? I shall edit it in). $\endgroup$
    – geoffc
    Apr 13, 2015 at 22:53
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Another of the infographics shows the ACES upper stage being 75% more awesome (presumably relative to Centaur?). Going to 6 boosters makes the booster thrust 20% greater but that's not a 20% overall improvement. There is some super creative math going on here, for sure. $\endgroup$ Apr 13, 2015 at 23:09
  • $\begingroup$ They say "350%" more lift, not "350% more thrust." Either their terminology is imprecise, or they're actually talking about lifts, which would be consonant with the usage in the rest of the infographic. $\endgroup$ Apr 14, 2015 at 11:05

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.