Space Exploration Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for spacecraft operators, scientists, engineers, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
As mentioned in the question Climbing at terminal velocity minimizes losses? But why? And "of what"? terminal velocity is important when launching space craft from Kerbal (Game Kerbal Space Program). The question has an answer suggesting "Yes it does matter" but the math is over my head and it does not reference any launches from Earth.
Do launches from Earth make any attempt to accelerate at or near terminal velocity? What kind of real life impact is there for fuel consumption?
No, launches don't specifically target terminal velocity. They target an optimized trajectory that minimizes the total propellant required to counter both atmospheric drag and gravity losses on the way to orbit.
If your only objective were to gain altitude, then you would go straight up and, while drag matters, try to track your terminal velocity at the current density. However if you're trying to get to orbit, the altitude gain is a relatively small part of your problem. A small rocket will get a given payload to orbital altitude (and then fall back down).
You will need a much, much bigger rocket to get that same payload to orbital velocity as well. A launch vehicle will start to pitch over almost immediately after clearing the tower in order to start gaining horizontal velocity, at which point the terminal velocity optimization is irrelevant.
The most efficient trajectory (which includes a velocity profile) depends on a lot of factors. Spending as little time as possible fighting gravity drag is generally a good thing, but there are limits. Drag is one of those limits.
Drag increases with the square of velocity. So at some point, going faster will be less efficient than going slower. This depends on a lot of factors and is probably not terminal velocity.
