There is little hope that chemical propulsion will have alternative orbital launch in near future. Using the same (even optimized) engines and fuel for inter-orbital operations will increase start-to-payload mass ratio exponentially. Roughly, inter-orbital operations and propulsive landing will need the same delta-V as orbital launch one-way only. By hypothetical reduction of launching cost by two orders of magnitude(the maximum whoever could promise), the Mars delivery will cost nearly the same as ISS resupply.

Some projects for permanent human presence in Mars are based on large reusable rockets. May this type of logistic travel support Martian colony for less than $1M per person?

So, sorry, you're asking about, what have we done in respect to thinking about Mars, sort of, colonial systems? The question is, how did I come up with half a million dollar price tag to move to Mars. Well, umm, I sorta started back from the half a million dollar point.

Transcript - Elon Musk lecture at the Royal Aeronautical Society


closed as primarily opinion-based by kim holder, ForgeMonkey, mins, Vedant Chandra, andy256 Jun 7 '15 at 3:11

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. What is your question? $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Jun 6 '15 at 7:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Brian Tompsett --Thanks for spelling. $\endgroup$ – Val Jun 6 '15 at 13:06
  • $\begingroup$ 'Reasonable cost' is a matter of opinion. At any rate, I don't think it is possible to calculate what the cost would be even to within an order of magnitude. As you say, SpaceX hopes for a 100x reduction in cost, but that is extremely hypothetical. And look at how much more the Space Shuttle cost than was expected. $\endgroup$ – kim holder Jun 6 '15 at 15:05
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A lot of speculation here so answers are more opinion than factual answers. But my opinion: If earth and Mars are sole sources of propellent, spacecraft could only be partially re-usable. Much of the spacecraft would remain disposable and transportation costs would remain too high for sustainable development of Mars. $\endgroup$ – HopDavid Jun 6 '15 at 18:50

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.